Active Copper Cables (ACC) represent a critical evolution in high-speed data center interconnection technology, bridging the gap between traditional passive Direct Attach Cables (DAC) and more complex optical solutions. In today's rapidly expanding data centers driven by artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and high-performance computing workloads, the demand for cost-effective, power-efficient, and reliable short-to-medium distance connectivity has never been greater.

Why ACC Technology Matters

The significance of ACC technology in modern data centers cannot be overstated. As data rates have escalated from 10 Gbps to 100 Gbps, 400 Gbps, and now 800 Gbps, the physical limitations of copper transmission have become increasingly challenging. Traditional passive copper cables, while cost-effective and power-efficient, are limited to approximately 3 meters at high data rates due to signal attenuation and dispersion.

ACC technology addresses this limitation by introducing intelligent signal conditioning directly within the cable assembly. The integrated Redriver chip performs real-time signal equalization, compensating for high-frequency losses that occur during electrical transmission through copper conductors. This innovation extends the viable transmission distance to 5-7 meters while maintaining excellent signal integrity and bit error rate performance.

Real-World Relevance and Industry Impact

In practical data center deployments, ACC cables have become essential for several critical interconnection scenarios. They are extensively used for rack-to-rack connections where servers need to communicate with Top-of-Rack (ToR) switches. Unlike passive cables that require equipment to be in immediate proximity, ACC enables more flexible rack layouts and improves airflow management within the data center.

The economic impact is substantial. ACC cables typically cost 30-50% less than equivalent active optical cables (AOC) while consuming only 1.2-1.8 watts of power compared to the 2-4 watts required by optical solutions. For hyperscale data centers deploying thousands of interconnections, these savings translate to millions of dollars in capital and operational expenditures annually.

Industry Applications

ACC technology finds applications across multiple industry segments:

• Hyperscale Data Centers: Major cloud service providers utilize ACC for intra-rack and cross-rack server-to-switch connectivity, balancing cost, power consumption, and performance requirements.
• Artificial Intelligence Clusters: AI training infrastructures require massive parallel processing capabilities. ACC cables enable high-bandwidth GPU-to-GPU and GPU-to-switch connections essential for distributed training workloads.
• High-Performance Computing: Scientific research facilities and supercomputing centers deploy ACC for low-latency interconnections between compute nodes, storage systems, and networking fabrics.
• Enterprise Data Centers: Mid-sized enterprises benefit from ACC's cost-effectiveness while upgrading to 100G and 400G network architectures without the complexity of optical infrastructure.
• Telecommunications Infrastructure: Carrier-grade switching environments use ACC for equipment interconnections within central offices and mobile network aggregation points.

Key Concepts Preview

As we progress through this guide, each section builds upon these foundational concepts to provide a complete technical understanding of ACC technology. The interactive simulators allow you to experiment with various parameters and observe their real-time effects on system performance, reinforcing theoretical knowledge with practical insights.

The Origins of Copper-Based Data Center Interconnection

The story of Active Copper Cables begins with the evolution of data center networking from the early 2000s. Initially, data centers relied heavily on optical fiber interconnections using standard SFP (Small Form-factor Pluggable) transceivers. While optical solutions provided excellent range and bandwidth, they came with significant cost penalties, particularly for short-distance intra-rack connections.

In 2006, the introduction of Direct Attach Copper (DAC) cables revolutionized short-reach data center connectivity. DAC cables, standardized through the SFP+ MSA (Multi-Source Agreement), offered a compelling value proposition: they eliminated the need for separate transceivers and optical fiber, instead using integrated copper twinaxial cable assemblies. These passive cables provided 10 Gbps connectivity over distances up to 5 meters at a fraction of the cost of optical solutions, with zero power consumption beyond the host interface.

The 40G/100G Transition and Emergence of Active Solutions

The transition to 40 Gigabit Ethernet (40GbE) and 100 Gigabit Ethernet (100GbE) around 2010-2013 exposed fundamental limitations in passive copper technology. The physics of copper transmission dictates that signal attenuation increases with both frequency and distance. As data rates quadrupled from 10G to 40G/100G, the skin effect and dielectric losses became increasingly problematic.

At 25 Gbps NRZ (Non-Return-to-Zero) signaling per lane, passive copper cables experienced severe high-frequency attenuation, reducing practical transmission distances to approximately 3 meters. Beyond this distance, the received signal's eye diagram degraded to levels incompatible with reliable data recovery. This constraint created operational challenges in data center design, forcing equipment to be placed in close proximity and limiting flexibility in rack layout.

The industry responded by developing active cable technologies. Initial approaches included Active Optical Cables (AOC), which integrated optical transceivers directly into the cable assembly. However, AOCs introduced their own challenges: higher power consumption (2-4 watts), sensitivity to temperature variations, and costs that remained substantially higher than copper alternatives.

Key Milestones and Technological Breakthroughs

Pioneer Contributions and Industry Collaboration

The development of ACC technology represents a collaborative effort across multiple industry segments. Silicon vendors played a crucial role by developing specialized Redriver integrated circuits capable of high-speed signal conditioning with minimal power consumption. These chips implement sophisticated analog equalization algorithms optimized for the specific loss characteristics of copper twinaxial cables.

Cable manufacturers contributed expertise in mechanical design and materials science. The challenge was to create cable assemblies that maintained controlled 100-ohm differential impedance while achieving sufficient flexibility for data center installations. Innovations in dielectric materials and conductor geometry enabled manufacturers to produce thinner cables with improved electrical performance.

Network equipment vendors, particularly those serving hyperscale data centers, drove standardization efforts through industry organizations. The Optical Internetworking Forum (OIF) and IEEE 802.3 working groups established electrical specifications ensuring interoperability across different equipment manufacturers. These standards define critical parameters such as output voltage swing, return loss, and jitter tolerance.

Evolution from NRZ to PAM4 Signaling

A pivotal advancement in ACC technology came with the transition from NRZ (Non-Return-to-Zero) to PAM4 (Pulse Amplitude Modulation 4-level) signaling. Traditional NRZ encoding represents binary data using two voltage levels, requiring a symbol rate equal to the bit rate. As the industry pushed toward 400G and 800G, maintaining NRZ signaling would have necessitated 100 Gbps or 200 Gbps per electrical lane, frequencies approaching the practical limits of both copper transmission and semiconductor technology.

PAM4 modulation elegantly addresses this challenge by encoding two bits per symbol using four distinct voltage levels. This approach effectively doubles the data rate while maintaining the same symbol rate (and thus frequency content) as NRZ. For example, 400G transmission using 8 lanes requires only 53.125 GBaud PAM4 signaling rather than 50 GBaud at the bit level, remaining within the feasible frequency range for copper transmission.

However, PAM4 introduces additional complexity for ACC design. The reduced voltage spacing between signal levels decreases noise margins, making the link more sensitive to attenuation and interference. ACC Redriver circuits must implement more sophisticated equalization algorithms to maintain adequate signal-to-noise ratio. Modern ACC designs achieve this through adaptive CTLE circuits that dynamically adjust equalization based on measured signal characteristics.

Current State of ACC Technology

As of 2025, ACC technology has matured into a well-established solution for data center connectivity. The current generation of ACC products supports data rates from 100G to 800G across various form factors including QSFP28, QSFP56, QSFP-DD, and OSFP. Manufacturing volumes have increased dramatically, with major cable vendors producing millions of units annually to supply hyperscale data center deployments.

Recent innovations focus on several key areas. Power efficiency improvements have reduced typical ACC power consumption to 1.2-1.5 watts for 400G applications, approaching the zero-power characteristic of passive cables. Thermal management enhancements allow reliable operation in high-density server environments where ambient temperatures may exceed 40°C. Cable diameter reductions improve airflow and reduce the physical bulk of cable bundles connecting dense switch fabrics.

Future Outlook and Emerging Trends

Looking forward, several trends are shaping the future evolution of ACC technology. The transition to 1.6 Terabit Ethernet (1.6T) is driving development of next-generation ACC solutions operating at 200 Gbps per lane. These ultra-high-speed applications will likely require more advanced equalization techniques, possibly incorporating Decision Feedback Equalization (DFE) alongside CTLE.

Artificial Intelligence and machine learning workloads are creating new demands for specialized ACC variants. GPU-to-GPU interconnections in AI training clusters require not just high bandwidth but also predictable, low latency. Custom ACC designs optimized for these applications are emerging, featuring enhanced jitter performance and latency characteristics below 100 nanoseconds.

Sustainability considerations are increasingly influencing ACC development. The industry is exploring eco-friendly materials for cable jackets and connectors while improving recyclability of electronic components. Power efficiency remains a priority, with research into novel Redriver architectures that could further reduce energy consumption.

The line between ACC and Active Electrical Cables (AEC) continues to blur as technological capabilities converge. Future ACC products may incorporate limited retiming capabilities or forward error correction (FEC), features traditionally associated with AEC. This evolution reflects the industry's continuous innovation to meet the demanding requirements of next-generation data center architectures.

Basic Principles of Active Copper Cable Operation

At its core, an Active Copper Cable functions as an intelligent signal conduit that actively compensates for the physical limitations inherent in electrical transmission through copper conductors. To understand ACC operation, we must first examine why active compensation is necessary.

When high-speed electrical signals propagate through copper cables, they experience frequency-dependent attenuation. Lower frequency components travel relatively unimpeded, while high-frequency components suffer increasingly severe attenuation. This phenomenon occurs due to the skin effect (where current density concentrates near the conductor surface at high frequencies) and dielectric losses in the cable insulation. For a typical 5-meter copper cable at 25 GHz, attenuation can reach 20-30 dB, meaning the signal power is reduced by a factor of 100 to 1000.

The challenge is compounded by Inter-Symbol Interference (ISI). As high-frequency components are attenuated more than low-frequency ones, the received signal's rise and fall times degrade. This causes energy from one symbol period to "smear" into adjacent periods, making it difficult for the receiver to correctly identify individual bits. The eye diagram—a standard measure of signal quality—closes as ISI increases, eventually reaching a point where reliable data recovery becomes impossible.

Technical Terminology and Definitions

Signal Integrity Terminology

Differential Signaling: ACC cables use differential transmission, where data is encoded as the voltage difference between two complementary conductors. This approach provides excellent noise immunity since electromagnetic interference affects both conductors equally, leaving the differential voltage unchanged. Differential impedance is typically maintained at 100 ohms ± 10%.

Return Loss: A measure of signal reflection at impedance discontinuities. Good ACC designs maintain return loss better than -10 dB across the operating frequency range, ensuring that less than 10% of signal energy is reflected back toward the transmitter.

Insertion Loss: The total signal attenuation from transmitter to receiver, typically specified in dB at the Nyquist frequency (half the baud rate). For ACC applications, the Redriver must compensate for insertion losses ranging from 15 dB to 30 dB depending on cable length and frequency.

Jitter: Temporal deviation of signal transitions from their ideal timing. ACC systems must manage both Random Jitter (RJ) caused by thermal noise and Deterministic Jitter (DJ) arising from ISI and crosstalk. Total jitter specifications for modern ACC typically require less than 0.25 UI (Unit Interval) peak-to-peak.

Equalization Terminology

CTLE (Continuous Time Linear Equalization): An analog equalization technique implementing a high-pass filter transfer function. CTLE provides gain that increases with frequency, compensating for the cable's low-pass characteristic. The equalization curve is carefully shaped to match the cable's loss profile across the frequency spectrum of interest.

Equalization Boost: The maximum gain applied by the CTLE at high frequencies, typically specified in dB. Modern ACC Redrivers offer configurable boost levels from 0 dB to 12 dB or more, allowing optimization for different cable lengths and loss characteristics.

Peaking Frequency: The frequency at which CTLE gain reaches its maximum value. Proper selection of peaking frequency is critical; too low and high-frequency ISI remains, too high and noise is unnecessarily amplified.

How ACC Works: Step-by-Step Operation

Understanding ACC operation requires examining the complete signal path from transmitter through cable to receiver. Let's walk through this process systematically.

Step 1: Signal Generation at Transmitter

The host ASIC or SerDes (Serializer/Deserializer) generates differential electrical signals at the transmitter. For a 100G ACC using four lanes of 25G NRZ, each lane transmits at 25.78125 Gbps (including forward error correction overhead). The transmitter output typically provides 400-800 mV differential swing with controlled rise times around 20-30 picoseconds.

Step 2: Cable Transmission

Signals propagate through the copper twinaxial cable assembly. During this phase, multiple physical phenomena affect signal integrity. High-frequency components attenuate more severely than low-frequency ones due to skin effect. Dielectric losses in the cable insulation further reduce signal amplitude. Impedance variations along the cable length can cause reflections. By the time signals reach the cable's far end, high-frequency content may be attenuated by 20-30 dB, and the received eye diagram is severely degraded.

Step 3: Signal Reception by Redriver

The attenuated signal enters the Redriver IC's input stage. Input buffers present a high-impedance, properly terminated interface to minimize reflections. The Redriver's input circuitry must be sensitive enough to detect signals as small as 50-100 mV differential while maintaining adequate noise immunity.

Step 4: CTLE Equalization

This is where the "magic" happens. The CTLE circuit applies frequency-dependent gain that precisely compensates for the cable's frequency-dependent loss. The equalization transfer function is carefully designed to flatten the overall channel response. Adaptive CTLE implementations can automatically adjust equalization parameters based on measured signal characteristics, optimizing performance across varying cable lengths and environmental conditions.

Step 5: Signal Re-driving

After equalization, the signal is re-driven with full voltage swing and proper slew rates to meet the receiver's specifications. The output driver must provide sufficient current to drive the receiver's input capacitance while maintaining signal integrity. Output swing is typically restored to 400-800 mV differential.

Step 6: Reception at Host Equipment

The equalized and re-driven signal enters the receiver ASIC. At this point, the eye diagram has been restored to specification, with adequate eye height and width to ensure reliable data recovery. The receiver's clock data recovery (CDR) circuit extracts timing information, samples the signal at optimal points, and recovers the original data stream.

Key Components and Their Roles

Conceptual Models and Frameworks

To develop intuition about ACC behavior, several conceptual models prove valuable. The channel equalization model views the transmission system as a cascade of transfer functions: transmitter output impedance, cable loss characteristic, Redriver equalization, and receiver input impedance. System design aims to achieve an overall flat frequency response, ensuring all spectral components arrive with equal amplitude at the decision point.

The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) model recognizes that equalization amplifies both signal and noise. At high frequencies where cable loss is severe, CTLE applies maximum gain. However, this gain amplifies high-frequency noise as well, potentially degrading SNR. Optimal equalization represents a tradeoff between opening the eye diagram (requiring aggressive equalization) and maintaining adequate SNR (favoring conservative equalization).

The eye diagram framework provides an intuitive visualization of ACC performance. An ideal signal produces a fully open eye with clean transitions and maximum vertical and horizontal openings. Cable attenuation causes the eye to close as ISI increases. CTLE equalization reopens the eye by restoring high-frequency content, but excessive equalization can amplify noise, reducing eye height. The goal is finding the equalization sweet spot that maximizes the eye opening.

Mathematical Foundations

ACC design rests on solid mathematical foundations, particularly in the areas of linear systems theory and signal processing. The cable's transfer function can be modeled as:

The attenuation coefficient typically follows a power law relationship:

The CTLE equalization function compensates for cable loss by implementing an inverse characteristic:

The overall channel response ideally approaches unity (0 dB) across the frequency range of interest:

These mathematical relationships guide Redriver IC design, allowing engineers to synthesize CTLE circuits with transfer functions that precisely match the cable loss profile across the operating frequency range.

System Architecture Overview

An Active Copper Cable comprises multiple subsystems working in concert to achieve reliable high-speed data transmission. Understanding the architectural organization provides insight into design tradeoffs and optimization strategies. The complete ACC assembly can be logically divided into three major sections: the transmitter-side connector module (passive), the copper cable assembly (passive transmission line), and the receiver-side connector module (containing active Redriver electronics).

This asymmetric architecture—with active electronics only at the receiver end—represents a key cost and power optimization. Earlier experimental designs placed Redrivers at both ends, but industry experience demonstrated that receiver-side equalization alone provides sufficient performance for typical data center distances. The transmitter-side module remains entirely passive, containing only the mechanical connector, electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding, and cable termination.

Component Breakdown with Detailed Explanations

1. Copper Twinaxial Cable Assembly

The cable itself serves as the transmission medium and represents one of the most critical components affecting ACC performance. Modern ACC cables use twinaxial construction, where each differential signal pair consists of two insulated copper conductors surrounded by a common shield. Multiple pairs (typically 4 or 8 depending on the application) are bundled together within an outer jacket.

Conductor Specifications: Wire gauge typically ranges from AWG 30 (0.255 mm diameter) to AWG 34 (0.160 mm diameter). Thicker conductors offer lower DC resistance and slightly better high-frequency performance but result in stiffer, bulkier cables. Thinner conductors enable more flexible cables suitable for tight bends in dense server environments but exhibit higher losses. The conductor material is high-purity copper, often silver-plated to reduce skin-effect losses at multi-gigahertz frequencies.

Dielectric Material: The insulation surrounding each conductor uses specialized low-loss dielectric materials, typically foam polyethylene or foamed fluoropolymers. These materials provide dielectric constants in the range of 1.3-2.1, significantly lower than solid polyethylene (2.3). Lower dielectric constant reduces capacitance per unit length, improving high-frequency performance. The dielectric must maintain consistent thickness and concentricity to ensure controlled 100-ohm differential impedance.

Shielding: Each differential pair is surrounded by a braided or foil shield providing electromagnetic isolation. This shields against external interference and prevents crosstalk between pairs. The outer cable jacket includes an additional overall shield. Effective shielding is essential in data center environments with high electromagnetic noise from power supplies, cooling fans, and adjacent high-speed signals.

2. Redriver Integrated Circuit

The Redriver IC represents the technological heart of ACC. This highly integrated semiconductor device implements analog signal processing functions optimized for high-speed serial link equalization. Understanding Redriver architecture illuminates how ACC achieves its performance characteristics.

Input Stage: The input stage implements differential receivers with high input impedance (typically 100 ohms differential) to properly terminate the cable and minimize reflections. Input sensitivity must be extremely high—capable of reliably detecting signals as small as 50-100 mV differential peak-to-peak. The input stage includes electrostatic discharge (ESD) protection to survive handling and hot-plug events without damage.

CTLE Equalizer: The CTLE block implements frequency-dependent gain using analog circuit techniques. Typical implementations use inductor-capacitor (LC) networks or active transistor-based circuits to synthesize the desired high-pass filter characteristic. Advanced Redrivers feature programmable CTLE with multiple selectable equalization curves, allowing optimization for different cable lengths. Some designs implement adaptive CTLE that automatically adjusts equalization based on measuring received signal characteristics.

Gain Control: Beyond frequency-dependent equalization, the Redriver includes overall gain adjustment to compensate for variations in cable loss and transmitter output swing. Variable gain amplifiers (VGAs) provide adjustable flat gain across all frequencies, complementing the frequency-dependent CTLE function. Together, CTLE and VGA ensure the equalized signal has both the correct frequency response and absolute amplitude.

Output Driver: The output stage must re-drive the equalized signal with sufficient voltage swing and current capability to meet the receiver's input specifications. Output drivers typically provide 400-800 mV differential swing with controlled output impedance of 100 ohms. The driver must maintain fast slew rates (rise/fall times under 20-30 ps) while minimizing overshoot and ringing. Modern implementations include pre-emphasis capability, allowing the driver to further enhance high-frequency content if needed.

Control Logic and Configuration: Redrivers incorporate digital control logic accessed via an I2C (Inter-Integrated Circuit) bus. This interface allows the host system to configure equalization parameters, monitor operational status, and access diagnostic information. Configuration data is typically stored in non-volatile memory within the Redriver or in a separate EEPROM.

3. Power Management Subsystem

Efficient power delivery is critical for ACC performance and reliability. The power management subsystem converts the 3.3V supply provided through the connector pins to the various voltages required by the Redriver IC and other electronics.

Voltage Regulation: Modern Redrivers typically require multiple supply voltages: a core analog supply (1.0-1.2V), I/O ring supply (1.8-2.5V), and possibly separate supplies for the output drivers. Low-dropout (LDO) linear regulators provide these voltages with excellent noise rejection, critical for analog signal processing. Total power consumption for a typical 400G ACC ranges from 1.2 to 1.8 watts.

Decoupling and Filtering: Extensive power supply decoupling prevents digital switching noise from coupling into sensitive analog circuits. Multiple decoupling capacitors of different values create low-impedance power distribution across a wide frequency range. Additional LC filters may isolate particularly sensitive circuits such as the CTLE and input stage.

4. EEPROM and Management Interface

ACC cables include non-volatile memory (EEPROM) storing identification, capability, and diagnostic information. This follows industry-standard specifications such as SFF-8636 for QSFP+ or CMIS (Common Management Interface Specification) for newer form factors.

Stored Information: The EEPROM contains vendor identification (manufacturer name, part number, serial number, manufacturing date), cable specifications (length, connector type, data rate capabilities, wavelength for optical), and capability flags indicating supported features. Real-time diagnostic data such as power consumption and temperature may also be available.

Management Interface: The host system communicates with the EEPROM via a two-wire I2C bus. This enables automatic cable detection and identification, allowing the host to configure its transmitter and receiver appropriately. Advanced diagnostic capabilities support failure analysis and predictive maintenance.

Data Flow and Signal Path

Tracing the signal path through an ACC reveals how components interact to achieve end-to-end transmission. Consider a 400G QSFP-DD ACC with 8 lanes of 50G PAM4:

Transmitter Output: The host ASIC generates 8 differential PAM4 signals at 26.5625 GBaud (including FEC overhead). Each signal swings between four voltage levels representing 2 bits per symbol. The differential output swing is typically 400-600 mV with controlled impedance matching.

Transmitter-Side Connector: Signals pass through the passive connector module, which provides mechanical support and EMI shielding. High-frequency PCB design ensures signal integrity through the transition from ASIC package to cable.

Cable Propagation: Signals propagate through the twinaxial cable at a velocity determined by the dielectric constant, typically 70-80% of the speed of light. A 5-meter cable introduces approximately 25-30 nanoseconds of propagation delay. During propagation, high-frequency components experience severe attenuation—at 13 GHz (Nyquist frequency for 26.5625 GBaud), insertion loss may exceed 25 dB.

Receiver-Side Connector and Redriver: The severely attenuated signal enters the receiver-side connector module containing the Redriver IC. The input stage receives the weak signal, the CTLE applies frequency-dependent equalization, and the output driver regenerates a clean signal meeting the receiver's input requirements.

Receiver Input: The restored signal enters the host ASIC's receiver. The receiver's CDR extracts clock information, samples the PAM4 signal at optimal points, makes four-level decisions, and recovers the original data stream. Forward error correction decodes and corrects any residual bit errors.

Protocols and Standards

ACC operation adheres to multiple industry standards ensuring interoperability across equipment from different manufacturers:

These standards define critical parameters including differential impedance (100 ohms ± 10%), return loss requirements (typically better than -10 dB), output voltage swing ranges, jitter budgets, and test methodologies for compliance verification. Adherence to these standards ensures that ACC cables from any qualified vendor will interoperate with compliant host equipment.

Transmission Line Theory Foundations

Active Copper Cable performance is fundamentally governed by transmission line theory, which describes how electrical signals propagate through distributed parameter systems. The copper twinaxial cable behaves as a lossy transmission line characterized by four primary parameters per unit length: series resistance R, series inductance L, shunt conductance G, and shunt capacitance C.

These parameters combine to determine the transmission line's complex propagation constant γ, which governs signal behavior:

The attenuation constant α directly determines how signal amplitude decreases with distance. For a cable of length L, the voltage attenuation is:

Frequency-Dependent Loss Characteristics

A critical aspect of ACC design is understanding how cable losses vary with frequency. The attenuation constant follows an empirical relationship combining skin effect and dielectric loss contributions:

For example, calculating attenuation at 13 GHz (Nyquist frequency for 26.5625 GBaud PAM4) over 5 meters:

CTLE Equalization Transfer Function

The CTLE circuit must implement a transfer function that compensates for the cable's frequency-dependent losses. A first-order CTLE is modeled as:

For more precise equalization, higher-order CTLE designs use multiple zero-pole pairs:

Eye Diagram Mathematics

The eye diagram provides a visual representation of signal quality and is mathematically related to bit error rate. The vertical eye opening (VEO) and horizontal eye width (HEW) can be quantified:

The relationship between eye opening and bit error rate (BER) follows statistical principles. For Gaussian noise distributions:

Signal-to-Noise Ratio Analysis

CTLE equalization amplifies both signal and noise. The SNR at the CTLE output depends on the equalization applied:

The equalization penalty term quantifies how CTLE gain affects noise. Aggressive equalization (high boost) increases this penalty, degrading SNR despite improving ISI.

Practical Design Example

Consider designing CTLE for a 5-meter 100G QSFP28 ACC (4 lanes × 25G NRZ). Required calculations:

Power Dissipation Calculations

Redriver power consumption is critical for ACC design. Power dissipation depends on several factors:

Thermal Management Equations

Thermal design ensures the Redriver operates within specified temperature limits:

Classification by Data Rate and Form Factor

Active Copper Cables are available in multiple configurations optimized for different data rates and physical form factors. Understanding these variations helps network engineers select appropriate solutions for specific deployment scenarios.

100G ACC (QSFP28 Form Factor)

100G ACC cables use the QSFP28 (Quad Small Form-factor Pluggable 28) form factor, supporting four lanes of 25G NRZ or 50G PAM4 signaling. These cables have become extremely common in modern data centers as enterprises upgrade from legacy 40G infrastructure. The 100G QSFP28 ACC typically achieves 5-7 meter reach with power consumption around 1.2-1.5 watts per module. Applications include server-to-ToR switch connections, spine-leaf fabric interconnections, and storage area network links.

200G ACC (QSFP56 Form Factor)

200G ACC cables utilize the QSFP56 form factor, operating with four lanes of 50G PAM4 signaling. This configuration provides a 2× bandwidth upgrade path for organizations not yet ready for 400G deployments. The electrical characteristics are similar to 100G but with higher lane rates requiring more sophisticated equalization. Typical reach extends to 4-5 meters with power consumption of 1.4-1.8 watts.

400G ACC (QSFP-DD and OSFP Form Factors)

400G represents the current mainstream deployment rate for hyperscale data centers. Two primary form factors serve this application: QSFP-DD (Double Density) uses eight lanes of 50G PAM4 in a backward-compatible QSFP mechanical envelope, while OSFP (Octal Small Form-factor Pluggable) offers a larger form factor with improved thermal management. QSFP-DD ACC is particularly popular for its compatibility with existing switch faceplate densities. Power consumption ranges from 1.5-2.0 watts, with achievable reaches of 3-5 meters depending on cable quality and equalization capability.

800G ACC (OSFP and QSFP-DD800 Form Factors)

800G ACC cables represent the cutting edge of copper-based data center connectivity. These assemblies use eight lanes of 100G PAM4 (or possibly 16 lanes of 50G PAM4 in future implementations). The aggressive signaling rates push copper transmission to its practical limits, typically constraining ACC reach to 2-3 meters. Power consumption increases to 2.0-2.5 watts due to the more complex equalization required. Current 800G ACC deployments are concentrated in AI training clusters and high-performance computing applications where the bandwidth density justifies the reach limitations.

Breakout Cable Configurations

An important ACC variant is the breakout cable, which splits a high-speed port into multiple lower-speed connections. These assemblies provide cost-effective migration paths and enable flexible network topologies.

400G-to-4×100G ACC Breakout: This configuration connects a single 400G QSFP-DD or OSFP port to four 100G QSFP28 ports. The breakout cable contains a gearbox integrated circuit that converts the 400G port's 8×50G PAM4 electrical interface into four 4×25G NRZ interfaces suitable for 100G ports. This enables organizations to leverage existing 100G equipment while upgrading their core switches to 400G. The Redriver functionality resides at each 100G connector end, ensuring signal integrity over the typical 3-5 meter cable length.

400G-to-2×200G ACC Breakout: Similar to the 4×100G variant, this breakout splits one 400G port into two 200G connections. The conversion is simpler as both 400G and 200G use PAM4 signaling; the gearbox primarily handles lane aggregation/disaggregation. This configuration suits intermediate migration scenarios or applications requiring 200G bandwidth per connection.

200G-to-4×50G and Other Breakout Ratios: Various other breakout configurations exist to address specific network topology requirements. The common theme is flexibility—enabling network architects to optimize port utilization and minimize cost by matching bandwidth to actual requirements rather than over-provisioning.

Comparison: ACC vs DAC vs AEC vs AOC

Advantages and Disadvantages Analysis

Selection Decision Matrix

Real-World Deployment Scenarios

Active Copper Cables have proven their value across diverse data center architectures and use cases. Understanding these practical applications helps network engineers make informed deployment decisions.

Scenario 1: Hyperscale Data Center Server-to-TOR Connections

In large-scale cloud service provider environments, ACC cables connect compute servers to Top-of-Rack (ToR) switches. A typical deployment involves 40-48 servers per rack, each requiring 2× 100G uplinks for redundancy. At this scale, cable costs and power consumption significantly impact total cost of ownership.

Challenge: The rack layout requires 4-6 meter cable runs from servers mid-rack to switches mounted at the top. Passive DAC cables cannot reliably achieve this distance at 100G data rates. Active optical cables would work but at 3-4× the cost and 2× the power consumption.

Solution: Deployment of 100G QSFP28 ACC cables provides the necessary reach while maintaining economic viability. With ACC costing approximately $75-100 per cable versus $300-400 for equivalent AOC, the cost savings across thousands of servers reach millions of dollars. Power savings of 1.5-2 watts per cable further reduce operational expenses.

Results: The hyperscale provider achieved their connectivity requirements at approximately 60% lower capital cost compared to optical solutions. Annual power savings exceeded $200,000 for a 10,000-server deployment. Cable reliability metrics showed less than 0.01% failure rate over three years of operation.

Scenario 2: AI Training Cluster GPU Interconnection

Machine learning training clusters require massive parallel processing with high-bandwidth, low-latency interconnections between GPU accelerators. A recent deployment involved 512 GPU servers organized in a spine-leaf topology.

Challenge: Each GPU server hosts 8 GPUs requiring 400G connectivity to the leaf switches. The latency budget for distributed training is extremely tight—every nanosecond of added latency reduces training efficiency. Cable distances range from 3-7 meters depending on rack positioning.

Solution: 400G QSFP-DD ACC cables provided the optimal balance of bandwidth, latency, and cost. The ACC solution added only 2-3 nanoseconds of latency compared to passive cables, whereas optical alternatives would have added 8-10 nanoseconds due to E/O and O/E conversion.

Results: Training job completion times improved 12% compared to a previous generation using mixed DAC/AOC cabling. The consistency of ACC performance across all cable lengths eliminated latency variance that had previously caused load imbalance. Total interconnect cost was 55% lower than an all-optical design.

Scenario 3: Enterprise Data Center Spine-Leaf Fabric

A mid-sized enterprise modernized their data center network from legacy three-tier architecture to a modern spine-leaf design supporting 100G to servers and 400G spine-leaf uplinks.

Challenge: The physical layout placed leaf switches in end-of-row positions with spine switches in a central location, creating 5-8 meter cable runs. Budget constraints required cost-effective solutions, but performance could not be compromised as the network supported production applications.

Solution: ACC cables were specified for all spine-leaf uplinks. The 400G QSFP-DD ACC solution provided adequate performance at distances up to 7 meters, covering 95% of the required connections. A small number of longer runs (8-10 meters) used AEC cables.

Results: The hybrid ACC/AEC approach saved approximately $850,000 compared to an all-optical design while meeting all performance requirements. Network monitoring showed no degradation in throughput or error rates. The simplified procurement (single vendor for all copper cables) reduced project timeline by three weeks.

Detailed Case Study: Financial Services Trading Floor

Technical Requirements Analysis:

• Server-to-leaf connections: 2× 100G per server, maximum 5 meters
• Leaf-to-spine connections: 4× 400G per leaf, maximum 8 meters
• Latency budget: Minimize all sources of delay
• Reliability: Five-nines uptime (99.999%)
• Future-proofing: Support potential upgrade to 200G/800G

Solution Design:

The network architecture team selected ACC cables for all server-to-leaf connections and most leaf-to-spine connections. The decision factors included:

• ACC latency (28-32 nanoseconds) was within 5 nanoseconds of passive DAC
• ACC reliability statistics from hyperscale deployments showed acceptable failure rates
• Cost savings versus AOC freed budget for other optimizations
• ACC thermal stability suited the precisely controlled trading floor environment

Implementation Details:

Installation proceeded over a planned maintenance window with comprehensive pre-deployment testing:

• Every cable underwent factory testing including eye diagram analysis and bit error rate verification
• Cable routes were precisely measured and documented to minimize excess length
• Installation used cable management arms ensuring minimum bend radius requirements
• Post-installation verification included end-to-end latency measurement on every path

Measured Results:

Business Impact:

The deployment met all technical objectives while delivering significant business value. Trading system performance improved measurably, with execution times reduced by 15 microseconds on average. This improvement, while seemingly small, provided competitive advantage in high-frequency trading strategies. The $340,000 cost savings versus optical solutions funded additional risk management system enhancements. Over the three-year operational period, zero cable failures occurred, validating the reliability of ACC technology in demanding financial services environments.

Troubleshooting Guide

Best Practices and Professional Recommendations