Amplifier design

When we talk about the internet and data, what often comes to mind are the speeds and how quickly we can download or upload content. But behind the scenes, it’s a game of efficiently packing data signals onto light waves traveling through optical fibers.If you’re an aspiring telecommunications professional or a student diving into the world of fiber optics, understanding the allocation of spectral bands is crucial. It’s like knowing the different climates in a world map of data transmission. Let’s explore the significance of these bands as defined by ITU-T recommendations and what they mean for fiber systems.

The Role of Spectral Bands in Single-Mode Fiber Systems

Original O-Band (1260 – 1360 nm): The journey of fiber optics began with the O-band, chosen for ITU T G.652 fibers due to its favorable dispersion characteristics and alignment with the cut-off wavelength of the cable. This band laid the groundwork for optical transmission without the need for amplifiers, making it a cornerstone in the early days of passive optical networks.

Extended E-Band (1360 – 1460 nm): With advancements, the E-band emerged to accommodate the wavelength drift of uncooled lasers. This extended range allowed for greater flexibility in transmissions, akin to broadening the canvas on which network artists could paint their data streams.

Short Wavelength S-Band (1460 – 1530 nm): The S-band, filling the gap between the E and C bands, has historically been underused for data transmission. However, it plays a crucial role in supporting the network infrastructure by housing pump lasers and supervisory channels, making it the unsung hero of the optical spectrum.

Conventional C-Band (1530 – 1565 nm): The beloved C-band owes its popularity to the era of erbium-doped fiber amplifiers (EDFAs), which provided the necessary gain for dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) systems. It’s the bread and butter of the industry, enabling vast data capacity and robust long-haul transmissions.

Long Wavelength L-Band (1565 – 1625 nm): As we seek to expand our data highways, the L-band has become increasingly important. With fiber performance improving over a range of temperatures, this band offers a wider wavelength range for signal transmission, potentially doubling the capacity when combined with the C-band.

Ultra-Long Wavelength U-Band (1625 – 1675 nm): The U-band is designated mainly for maintenance purposes and is not currently intended for transmitting traffic-bearing signals. This band ensures the network’s longevity and integrity, providing a dedicated spectrum for testing and monitoring without disturbing active data channels.

Historical Context and Technological Progress

It’s fascinating to explore why we have bands at all. The ITU G-series documents paint a rich history of fiber deployment, tracing the evolution from the first multimode fibers to the sophisticated single-mode fibers we use today.

In the late 1970s, multimode fibers were limited by both high attenuation at the 850 nm wavelength and modal dispersion. A leap to 1300 nm in the early 1980s marked a significant drop in attenuation and the advent of single-mode fibers. By the late 1980s, single-mode fibers were achieving commercial transmission rates of up to 1.7 Gb/s, a stark contrast to the multimode fibers of the past.

The designation of bands was a natural progression as single-mode fibers were designed with specific cutoff wavelengths to avoid modal dispersion and to capitalize on the low attenuation properties of the fiber.

The Future Beckons

With the ITU T G.65x series recommendations setting the stage, we anticipate future applications utilizing the full spectrum from 1260 nm to 1625 nm. This evolution, coupled with the development of new amplification technologies like thulium-doped amplifiers or Raman amplification, suggests that the S-band could soon be as important as the C and L bands.

Imagine a future where the combination of S+C+L bands could triple the capacity of our fiber infrastructure. This isn’t just a dream; it’s a realistic projection of where the industry is headed.

Conclusion

The spectral bands in fiber optics are not just arbitrary divisions; they’re the result of decades of research, development, and innovation. As we look to the horizon, the possibilities are as wide as the spectrum itself, promising to keep pace with our ever-growing data needs.

Reference

https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G/e

Introduction

The 980nm pump needs three energy level for radiation while 1480nm pumps can excite the ions directly to the metastable level .

(a) Energy level scheme of ground and first two excited states of Er ions in a silica matrix. The sublevel splitting and the lengths of arrows representing absorption and emission transitions are not drawn to scale. In the case of the 4 I11/2 state, s is the lifetime for nonradiative decay to the I13/2 first excited state and ssp is the spontaneous lifetime of the 4 I13/2 first excited state. (b) Absorption coefficient, a, and emission coefficient, g*, spectra for a typical aluminum co-doped EDF.

The most important feature of the level scheme is that the transition energy between the I15/2 ground state and the I13/2 first excited state corresponds to photon wavelengths (approximately 1530 to 1560 nm) for which the attenuation in silica fibers is lowest. Amplification is achieved by creating an inversion by pumping atoms into the first excited state, typically using either 980 nm or 1480 nm diode lasers. Because of the superior noise figure they provide and their superior wall plug efficiency, most EDFAs are built using 980 nm pump diodes. 1480 nm pump diodes are still often used in L-band EDFAs although here, too, 980 nm pumps are becoming more widely used.

Though pumping with 1480 nm is used and has an optical power conversion efficiency which is higher than that for 980 nm pumping, the latter is preferred because of the following advantages it has over 1480 nm pumping.

It provides a wider separation between the laser wavelength and pump wavelength.

980 nm pumping gives less noise than 1480nm.

Unlike 1480 nm pumping, 980 nm pumping cannot stimulate back transition to the ground state.

980 nm pumping also gives a higher signal gain, the maximum gain coefficient being 11 dB/mW against 6.3 dB/mW for the 1.48

The reason for better performance of 980 nm pumping over the 1.48 m pumping is related to the fact that the former has a narrower absorption spectrum.

The inversion factor almost becomes 1 in case of 980 nm pumping whereas for 1480 nm pumping the best one gets is about 1.6.

Quantum mechanics puts a lower limit of 3 dB to the optical noise figure at high optical gain. 980 nm pimping provides a value of 3.1 dB, close to the quantum limit whereas 1.48 pumping gives a value of 4.2 dB.

1480nm pump needs more electrical power compare to 980nm.

Application

The 980 nm pumps EDFA’s are widely used in terrestrial systems while 1480nm pumps are used as Remote Optically Pumped Amplifiers (ROPA) in subsea links where it is difficult to put amplifiers.For submarine systems, remote pumping can be used in order not to have to electrically feed the amplifiers and remove electronic parts.Nowadays ,this is used in pumping up to 200km.

The erbium-doped fiber can be activated by a pump wavelength of 980 or 1480 nm but only the second one is used in repeaterless systems due to the lower fiber loss at 1.48 mm with respect to the loss at 0.98 mm. This allows the distance between the terminal and the remote amplifier to be increased.

In a typical configuration, the ROPA is comprised of a simple short length of erbium doped fiber in the transmission line placed a few tens of kilometers before a shore terminal or a conventional in-line EDFA. The remote EDF is backward pumped by a 1480 nm laser, from the terminal or in-line EDFA, thus providing signal gain