Tag

Data Communication

Browsing

Fiber optics has revolutionized the way we transmit data, offering faster speeds and higher capacity than ever before. However, as with any powerful technology, there are significant safety considerations that must be taken into account to protect both personnel and equipment. This comprehensive guide provides an in-depth look at best practices for optical power safety in fiber optic communications.

Directly viewing fiber ends or connector faces can be hazardous. It’s crucial to use only approved filtered or attenuating viewing aids to inspect these components. This protects the eyes from potentially harmful laser emissions that can cause irreversible damage.

Unterminated fiber ends, if left uncovered, can emit laser light that is not only a safety hazard but can also compromise the integrity of the optical system. When fibers are not being actively used, they should be covered with material suitable for the specific wavelength and power, such as a splice protector or tape. This precaution ensures that sharp ends are not exposed, and the fiber ends are not readily visible, minimizing the risk of accidental exposure.

Optical connectors must be kept clean, especially in high-power systems. Contaminants can lead to the fiber-fuse phenomenon, where high temperatures and bright white light propagate down the fiber, creating a safety hazard. Before any power is applied, ensure that all fiber ends are free from contaminants.

Even a small amount of loss at connectors or splices can lead to a significant increase in temperature, particularly in high-power systems. Choosing the right connectors and managing splices carefully can prevent local heating that might otherwise escalate to system damage.

Ribbon fibers, when cleaved as a unit, can present a higher hazard level than single fibers. They should not be cleaved or spliced as an unseparated ribbon unless explicitly authorized. When using optical test cords, always connect the optical power source last and disconnect it first to avoid any inadvertent exposure to active laser light.

Fiber optics are delicate and can be damaged by excessive bending, which not only risks mechanical failure but also creates potential hotspots in high-power transmission. Careful routing and handling of fibers to avoid low-radius bends are essential best practices.

Board extenders should never be used with optical transmitter or amplifier cards. Only perform maintenance tasks in accordance with the procedures approved by the operating organization to avoid unintended system alterations that could lead to safety issues.

Employ test equipment that is appropriate for the task at hand. Using equipment with a power rating higher than necessary can introduce unnecessary risk. Ensure that the class of the test equipment matches the hazard level of the location where it’s being used.

Unauthorized modifications to optical fiber communication systems or related equipment are strictly prohibited, as they can introduce unforeseen hazards. Additionally, key control for equipment should be managed by a responsible individual to ensure the safe and proper use of all devices.

Optical safety labels are a critical aspect of safety. Any damaged or missing labels should be reported immediately. Warning signs should be posted in areas exceeding hazard level 1M, and even in lower classification locations, signs can provide an additional layer of safety.

Pay close attention to system alarms, particularly those indicating issues with automatic power reduction (APR) or other safety mechanisms. Prompt response to alarms can prevent minor issues from escalating into major safety concerns.

Raman Amplified Systems: A Special Note

Optical_safety

Raman amplified systems operate at sufficiently high powers that can cause damage to fibre or other components. This is somewhat described in clauses 14.2 and 14.5, but some additional guidance follows:

Before activating the Raman power

–           Calculate the distance to where the power is reduced to less than 150 mW.

–           If possible, inspect any splicing enclosures within that distance. If tight bends, e.g., less than 20mm diameter, are seen, try to remove or relieve the bend, or choose other fibres.

–           If inspection is not possible, a high resolution OTDR might be used to identify sources of bend or connector loss that could lead to damage under high power.

–           If connectors are used, it should be verified that the ends are very clean. Metallic contaminants are particularly prone to causing damage. Fusion splices are considered to be the least subject to damage.

While activating Raman power

In some cases, it may be possible to monitor the reflected light at the source as the Raman pump power is increased. If the plot of reflected power versus injected power shows a non‑linear characteristic, there could be a reflective site that is subject to damage. Other sites subject to damage, such as tight bends in which the coating absorbs the optical power, may be present without showing a clear signal in the reflected power versus injected power curve.

Operating considerations

If there is a reduction in the amplification level over time, it could be due to a reduced pump power or due to a loss increase induced by some slow damage mechanism such as at a connector interface. Simply increasing the pump power to restore the signal could lead to even more damage or catastrophic failure.

The mechanism for fibre failure in bending is that light escapes from the cladding and some is absorbed by the coating, which results in local heating and thermal reactions. These reactions tend to increase the absorption and thus increase the heating. When a carbon layer is formed, there is a runaway thermal reaction that produces enough heat to melt the fibre, which then goes into a kinked state that blocks all optical power. Thus, there will be very little change in the transmission characteristics induced by a damaging process until the actual failure occurs. If the fibre is unbuffered, there is a flash at the moment of failure which is self-extinguishing because the coating is gone very quickly. A buffered fibre could produce more flames, depending on the material. For unbuffered fibre, sub-critical damage is evidenced by a colouring of the coating at the apex of the bend.

Conclusion

By following these best practices for optical power safety, professionals working with fiber optic systems can ensure a safe working environment while maintaining the integrity and performance of the communication systems they manage.

For those tasked with the maintenance and operation of fiber optic systems, this guide serves as a critical resource, outlining the necessary precautions to ensure safety in the workplace. As the technology evolves, so too must our commitment to maintaining stringent safety standards in the dynamic field of fiber optic communications.

References

https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G/e

Carrier Ethernet: A Formal Definition

The MEF (Metro Ethernet Forum)  has defined Carrier Ethernet as the “ubiquitous, standardized, Carrier-class service defined by five attributes that distinguish Carrier Ethernet from the familiar LAN based Ethernet.” As depicted in Figure , these five attributes, in no particular order, are

1. Standardized services  

•E-Line, E-LAN provide transparent, private line, virtual private line and LAN services
•A ubiquitous service providing globally & locally via standardized equipment
•Requires no changes to customer LAN equipment or networks and accommodates existing network connectivity such as, time-sensitive, TDM traffic and signaling
•Ideally suited to converged voice, video & data networks
•Wide choice and granularity of bandwidth and quality of service options

  2. Scalability

•The ability for millions to use a network service that is ideal for the widest variety of business, information, communications and entertainment applications with voice, video and data
•Spans Access & Metro to National & Global Services over a wide variety of physical infrastructures implemented by a wide range of Service Providers
•Scalability of bandwidth from 1Mbps to 10Gbps and beyond, in granular increments

 

 

 

 

3. Reliability

•The ability for the network to detect & recover from incidents without impacting users
•Meeting the most demanding quality and availability requirements
•Rapid recovery time when problems do occur, as low as 50ms

4. Quality of Service (QoS)

•Wide choice and granularity of bandwidth and quality of service options
•Service Level Agreements (SLAs) that deliver end-to-end performance matching the requirements for voice, video and data over converged business and residential networks
•Provisioning via SLAs  that provide end-to-end performance based on CIR, frame loss, delay and delay variation characteristics

5. Service management

•The ability to monitor, diagnose and centrally manage the network, using standards-based vendor independent implementations
•Carrier-class OAM
•Rapid service provisioning

 

What is Carrier Ethernet?

Carrier Ethernet essentially augments traditional Ethernet, optimized for LAN deployment,with Carrier-class capabilities which make it optimal for deployment in Service Provider Access/Metro Area Networks and beyond, to the Wide Area Network. And conversely,from an end-user (enterprise) standpoint, Carrier Ethernet is a service that not only provides a standard Ethernet (or for that matter, a standardized non-Ethernethand-off  but also provides the robustness, deterministic performance, management, and flexibility expected of Carrier-class services.

Carrier Ethernet Architecture

 

Data moves from UNI to UNI across “the network” with a layered architecture.

When traffic moves between ETH domains is does so at the TRAN layer. This allows  Carrier Ethernet traffic to be
agnostic to the networks that it traverses

ce

 

ce1

MEF Carrier Ethernet Terminology

•The User Network Interface (UNI)
–The UNI is always provided by the Service Provider
–The UNI in a Carrier Ethernet Network is a physical Ethernet Interface at operating speeds 10Mbs, 100Mbps, 1Gbps or 10Gbps
•Ethernet Virtual Connection (EVC)
–Service container
–Connects two or more subscriber sites (UNI’s)
–An association of two or more UNIs
–Prevents data transfer between sites that are not part of the same EVC
–Three types of EVCs
•Point-to-Point
•Multipoint-to-Multipoint
•Rooted Multipoint
–Can be bundled or multiplexed on the same UNI
–Defined in MEF 10.2 technical specification
Carrier Ethernet Terminology
•UNI Type I
–A UNI compliant with MEF 13
–Manually Configurable
•UNI Type II
–Supports E-Tree
–Support service OAM, link protection
–Automatically Configurable via E-LMI
–Manageable via OAM
•Network to Network Interface (NNI)
–Network to Network Interface between distinct MEN operated by one or more carriers
–An active project of the MEF
•Metro Ethernet Network (MEN)
–An Ethernet transport network connecting user end-points
(Expanded to Access and Global networks in addition to the original Metro Network meaning)

Carrier Ethernet Service Types

ce3
Services Using E-Line Service Type

Ethernet Private Line (EPL)

•Replaces a TDM Private line
•Port-based service with single service (EVC) across dedicated UNIs providing site-to-site connectivity
•Typically delivered over SDH (Ethernet over SDH)
•Most popular Ethernet service due to its simplicity

Ethernet Virtual Private Line (EVPL)

•Replaces Frame Relay or ATM L2 VPN services
–To deliver higher bandwidth, end-to-end services
•Enables multiple services (EVCs) to be delivered over  single physical connection (UNI) to customer premises
•Supports “hub & spoke” connectivity via Service Multiplexed UNI at hub site
–Similar to Frame Relay or Private Line hub and spoke deployments
Services Using E-LAN Service Type
•EP-LAN: Each UNI dedicated to the EP-LAN service. Example use is Transparent LAN
•EVP-LAN: Service Multiplexing allowed at each UNI. Example use is Internet access and corporate VPN via one UNI

Services Using E-Tree Service Type

EP-Tree and EVP-Tree:  Both allow root – root and root – leaf communication but not leaf – leaf communication.

•EP-Tree requires dedication of the UNIs to the single EP-Tree service
•EVP-Tree allows each UNI to be support multiple simultaneous services at the cost of more complex configuration that EP-Tree

APPLICATION OF CARRIER ETHERNET

 

 

The Standardization of Services: Approved MEF Specifications

•MEF 2   Requirements and Framework for Ethernet Service Protection
•MEF 3  Circuit Emulation Service Definitions, Framework and Requirements in Metro Ethernet Networks
•MEF 4   Metro Ethernet Network Architecture Framework
Part 1: Generic Framework
•MEF 6  Metro Ethernet Services Definitions Phase I
•MEF 7   EMS-NMS Information Model
•MEF 8  Implementation Agreement for the Emulation of PDH Circuits over Metro Ethernet Networks
•MEF 9   Abstract Test Suite for Ethernet Services at the UNI
•MEF 10   Ethernet Services Attributes Phase I
•MEF 11   User Network Interface (UNI) Requirements and Framework
•MEF 12  Metro Ethernet Network Architecture Framework
Part 2: Ethernet Services Layer
•MEF 13   User Network Interface (UNI) Type 1 Implementation Agreement
•MEF 14   Abstract Test Suite for Traffic Management Phase 1
•MEF 15  Requirements for Management of Metro Ethernet
Phase 1 Network Elements
•MEF 16   Ethernet Local Management Interface

How the MEF Specifications Enable Carrier Ethernet