optical networking

In Standards 3 Mins Read

Basics of 5G Transport Network Architecture

By MapYourTech January 2, 2024

The advent of 5G technology is set to revolutionise the way we connect, and at its core lies a sophisticated transport network architecture. This architecture is designed to support the varied requirements of 5G’s advanced services and applications.

As we migrate from the legacy 4G to the versatile 5G, the transport network must evolve to accommodate new deployment strategies influenced by the functional split options specified by 3GPP and the drift of the Next Generation Core (NGC) network towards cloud-edge deployment.

**Deployment location of core network in 5G network**

The Four Pillars of 5G Transport Network

1. Fronthaul: This segment of the network deals with the connection between the high PHY and low PHY layers. It requires a high bandwidth, about 25 Gbit/s for a single UNI interface, escalating to 75 or 150 Gbit/s for an NNI interface in pure 5G networks. In hybrid 4G and 5G networks, this bandwidth further increases. The fronthaul’s stringent latency requirements (<100 microseconds) necessitate point-to-point (P2P) deployment to ensure rapid and efficient data transfer.

2. Midhaul: Positioned between the Packet Data Convergence Protocol (PDCP) and Radio Link Control (RLC), the midhaul section plays a pivotal role in data aggregation. Its bandwidth demands are slightly less than that of the fronthaul, with UNI interfaces handling 10 or 25 Gbit/s and NNI interfaces scaling according to the DU’s aggregation capabilities. The midhaul network typically adopts tree or ring modes to efficiently connect multiple Distributed Units (DUs) to a centralized Control Unit (CU).

3. Backhaul: Above the Radio Resource Control (RRC), the backhaul shares similar bandwidth needs with the midhaul. It handles both horizontal traffic, coordinating services between base stations, and vertical traffic, funneling various services like Vehicle to Everything (V2X), enhanced Mobile BroadBand (eMBB), and Internet of Things (IoT) from base stations to the 5G core.

4. NGC Interconnection: This crucial juncture interconnects nodes post-deployment in the cloud edge, demanding bandwidths equal to or in excess of 100 Gbit/s. The architecture aims to minimize bandwidth wastage, which is often a consequence of multi-hop connections, by promoting single hop connections.

The Impact of Deployment Locations

The transport network’s deployment locations—fronthaul, midhaul, backhaul, and NGC interconnection—each serve unique functions tailored to the specific demands of 5G services. From ensuring ultra-low latency in fronthaul to managing service diversity in backhaul, and finally facilitating high-capacity connectivity in NGC interconnections, the transport network is the backbone that supports the high-speed, high-reliability promise of 5G.

As we move forward into the 5G era, understanding and optimizing these transport network segments will be crucial for service providers to deliver on the potential of this transformative technology.

Reference

https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.Sup67-201907-I/en

In Standards 3 Mins Read

BER and FEC in Optical Network Performance

By MapYourTech January 2, 2024

Forward Error Correction (FEC) has become an indispensable tool in modern optical communication, enhancing signal integrity and extending transmission distances. ITU-T recommendations, such as G.693, G.959.1, and G.698.1, define application codes for optical interfaces that incorporate FEC as specified in ITU-T G.709. In this blog, we discuss the significance of Bit Error Ratio (BER) in FEC-enabled applications and how it influences optical transmitter and receiver performance.

The Basics of FEC in Optical Communications

FEC is a method of error control for data transmission, where the sender adds redundant data to its messages. This allows the receiver to detect and correct errors without the need for retransmission. In the context of optical networks, FEC is particularly valuable because it can significantly lower the BER after decoding, thus ensuring the accuracy and reliability of data across vast distances.

BER Requirements in FEC-Enabled Applications

For certain optical transport unit rates (OTUk), the system BER is mandated to meet specific standards only after FEC correction has been applied. The optical parameters, in these scenarios, are designed to achieve a BER no worse than 10⁻¹² at the FEC decoder’s output. This benchmark ensures that the data, once processed by the FEC decoder, maintains an extremely high level of accuracy, which is crucial for high-performance networks.

Practical Implications for Network Hardware

When it comes to testing and verifying the performance of optical hardware components intended for FEC-enabled applications, achieving a BER of 10⁻¹² at the decoder’s output is often sufficient. Attempting to test components at 10⁻¹² at the receiver output, prior to FEC decoding, can lead to unnecessarily stringent criteria that may not reflect the operational requirements of the application.

Adopting Appropriate BER Values for Testing

The selection of an appropriate BER for testing components depends on the specific application. Theoretical calculations suggest a BER of 1.8×10⁻⁴at the receiver output (Point A) to achieve a BER of 10⁻¹² at the FEC decoder output (Point B). However, due to variations in error statistics, the average BER at Point A may need to be lower than the theoretical value to ensure the desired BER at Point B. In practice, a BER range of 10⁻⁵ to 10⁻⁶ is considered suitable for most applications.

Conservative Estimation for Receiver Sensitivity

By using a BER of 10⁻⁶ for component verification, the measurements of receiver sensitivity and optical path penalty at Point A will be conservative estimates of the values after FEC correction. This approach provides a practical and cost-effective method for ensuring component performance aligns with the rigorous demands of FEC-enabled systems.

Conclusion

FEC is a powerful mechanism that significantly improves the error tolerance of optical communication systems. By understanding and implementing appropriate BER testing methodologies, network operators can ensure their components are up to the task, ultimately leading to more reliable and efficient networks.

As the demands for data grow, the reliance on sophisticated FEC techniques will only increase, cementing BER as a fundamental metric in the design and evaluation of optical communication systems.

References

https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G/e

In Standards 4 Mins Read

Spectral Bands for Single Mode Optical Fiber Systems

By MapYourTech January 2, 2024

When we talk about the internet and data, what often comes to mind are the speeds and how quickly we can download or upload content. But behind the scenes, it’s a game of efficiently packing data signals onto light waves traveling through optical fibers.If you’re an aspiring telecommunications professional or a student diving into the world of fiber optics, understanding the allocation of spectral bands is crucial. It’s like knowing the different climates in a world map of data transmission. Let’s explore the significance of these bands as defined by ITU-T recommendations and what they mean for fiber systems.

The Role of Spectral Bands in Single-Mode Fiber Systems

Original O-Band (1260 – 1360 nm): The journey of fiber optics began with the O-band, chosen for ITU T G.652 fibers due to its favorable dispersion characteristics and alignment with the cut-off wavelength of the cable. This band laid the groundwork for optical transmission without the need for amplifiers, making it a cornerstone in the early days of passive optical networks.

Extended E-Band (1360 – 1460 nm): With advancements, the E-band emerged to accommodate the wavelength drift of uncooled lasers. This extended range allowed for greater flexibility in transmissions, akin to broadening the canvas on which network artists could paint their data streams.

Short Wavelength S-Band (1460 – 1530 nm): The S-band, filling the gap between the E and C bands, has historically been underused for data transmission. However, it plays a crucial role in supporting the network infrastructure by housing pump lasers and supervisory channels, making it the unsung hero of the optical spectrum.

Conventional C-Band (1530 – 1565 nm): The beloved C-band owes its popularity to the era of erbium-doped fiber amplifiers (EDFAs), which provided the necessary gain for dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) systems. It’s the bread and butter of the industry, enabling vast data capacity and robust long-haul transmissions.

Long Wavelength L-Band (1565 – 1625 nm): As we seek to expand our data highways, the L-band has become increasingly important. With fiber performance improving over a range of temperatures, this band offers a wider wavelength range for signal transmission, potentially doubling the capacity when combined with the C-band.

Ultra-Long Wavelength U-Band (1625 – 1675 nm): The U-band is designated mainly for maintenance purposes and is not currently intended for transmitting traffic-bearing signals. This band ensures the network’s longevity and integrity, providing a dedicated spectrum for testing and monitoring without disturbing active data channels.

Historical Context and Technological Progress

It’s fascinating to explore why we have bands at all. The ITU G-series documents paint a rich history of fiber deployment, tracing the evolution from the first multimode fibers to the sophisticated single-mode fibers we use today.

In the late 1970s, multimode fibers were limited by both high attenuation at the 850 nm wavelength and modal dispersion. A leap to 1300 nm in the early 1980s marked a significant drop in attenuation and the advent of single-mode fibers. By the late 1980s, single-mode fibers were achieving commercial transmission rates of up to 1.7 Gb/s, a stark contrast to the multimode fibers of the past.

The designation of bands was a natural progression as single-mode fibers were designed with specific cutoff wavelengths to avoid modal dispersion and to capitalize on the low attenuation properties of the fiber.

The Future Beckons

With the ITU T G.65x series recommendations setting the stage, we anticipate future applications utilizing the full spectrum from 1260 nm to 1625 nm. This evolution, coupled with the development of new amplification technologies like thulium-doped amplifiers or Raman amplification, suggests that the S-band could soon be as important as the C and L bands.

Imagine a future where the combination of S+C+L bands could triple the capacity of our fiber infrastructure. This isn’t just a dream; it’s a realistic projection of where the industry is headed.

Conclusion

The spectral bands in fiber optics are not just arbitrary divisions; they’re the result of decades of research, development, and innovation. As we look to the horizon, the possibilities are as wide as the spectrum itself, promising to keep pace with our ever-growing data needs.