Category

Technical

Category

Both composite power and per channel power are important indicators of the quality and stability of an optical link, and they are used to optimize link performance and minimize system impairments.

Composite Power Vs Per Channel power for OSNR calculation.

When it comes to optical networks, one of the most critical parameters to consider is the OSNR or Optical Signal-to-Noise Ratio. It measures the signal quality of the optical link, which is essential to ensure proper transmission. The OSNR is affected by different factors, including composite power and per channel power. In this article, we will discuss in detail the difference between these two power measurements and how they affect the OSNR calculation.

What is Composite Power?

Composite power refers to the total power of all the channels transmitted in the optical network. It is the sum of the powers of all the individual channels combined including both the desired signal and any noise or interference.. The composite power is measured using an optical power meter that can measure the total power of the entire signal.

What is Per Channel Power?

Per channel power refers to the power of each channel transmitted in the optical network. It is the individual power of each channel in the network. It provides information on the power distribution among the different channels and can help identify any channel-specific performance issues.The per channel power is measured using an optical spectrum analyzer that can measure the power of each channel separately.

Difference between Composite Power and Per Channel Power

The difference between composite power and per channel power is crucial when it comes to OSNR calculation. The OSNR calculation is affected by both composite power and per channel power. The composite power determines the total power of the signal, while the per channel power determines the power of each channel.

In general, the OSNR is directly proportional to the composite power and inversely proportional to the per channel power. This means that as the composite power increases, the OSNR also increases. On the other hand, as the per channel power decreases, the OSNR decreases.

The reason for this is that the noise in the system is mostly generated by the amplifiers used to boost the signal power. As the per channel power decreases, the signal-to-noise ratio decreases, which affects the overall OSNR.

OSNR measures the quality of an optical signal by comparing the power of the desired signal to the power of any background noise or interference within the same bandwidth. A higher OSNR value indicates a better signal quality, with less noise and interference.

Q factor, on the other hand, measures the stability of an optical signal and is related to the linewidth of the optical source. A higher Q factor indicates a more stable and coherent signal.

To calculate OSNR using per-channel power, you would measure the power of the signal and the noise in each individual channel and then calculate the OSNR for each channel. The OSNR for the entire system would be the average OSNR across all channels.

In general, using per-channel power to calculate OSNR is more accurate, as it takes into account the variations in signal and noise power across the spectrum. However, measuring per-channel power can be more time-consuming and complex than measuring composite power.

Analysis

Following charts are used to deduce the understanding:-

Collected from Real device for Reference

Calculated OSNR and Q factor based on Per Channel Power.

Calculated OSNR and Q factor based on composite Power.

Calculated OSNR and Q factor based on Per Channel Power.

Calculated OSNR and Q factor based on composite Power.

Formulas used for calculation of OSNR, BER and Q factor

 

Useful Python Script 

import math
def calc_osnr(span_loss, composite_power, noise_figure, spans_count,channel_count):
"""
Calculates the OSNR for a given span loss, power per channel, noise figure, and number of spans.

Parameters:
span_loss (float): Span loss of each span (in dB).
composite_power (float): Composite power from amplifier (in dBm).
noise_figure (float): The noise figure of the amplifiers (in dB).
spans_count (int): The total number of spans.
channel_count (int): The total number of active channels.

Returns:
The OSNR (in dB).
"""
total_loss = span_loss+10*math.log10(spans_count) # total loss in all spans
power_per_channel = composite_power-10 * math.log10(channel_count) # add power from all channels and spans
noise_power = -58 + noise_figure # calculate thermal noise power
signal_power = power_per_channel - total_loss # calculate signal power
osnr = signal_power - noise_power # calculate OSNR
return osnr


osnr = calc_osnr(span_loss=23.8, composite_power=23.8, noise_figure=6, spans_count=3,channel_count=96)
if osnr > 8:
ber = 10* math.pow(10,10.7-1.45*osnr)
qfactor = -0.41667 + math.sqrt(-1.9688 - 2.0833* math.log10(ber)) # calculate OSNR
else:
ber = "Invalid OSNR,can't estimate BER"
qfactor="Invalid OSNR,can't estimate Qfactor"

result=[{"estimated_osnr":osnr},{"estimated_ber":ber},{"estimated_qfactor":qfactor}]
print(result)

Above program can be tested by using exact code at link.

dBm or decibel-milliwatt is an electrical power unit in decibel (dB), referenced to one milliwatt (mW).

dBm:- A mathematical Interpretation.

dBm definition

dBm or decibel-milliwatt is an electrical power unit in decibels (dB), referenced to 1 milliwatt (mW).
The power in decibel-milliwatts (P(dBm)) is equal to 10 times base 10 logarithm of the power in milliwatts (P(mW)):
P(dBm) = 10 · log10( P(mW) / 1mW )
The power in milliwatts (P(mW)) is equal to 1mW times 10 raised by the power in decibel-milliwatts (P(dBm)) divided by 10:
P(mW) = 1mW · 10(P(dBm) / 10)
1 milliwatt is equal to 0 dBm:
1mW = 0dBm
1 watt is equal to 30dBm:
1W = 1000mW = 30dBm

How to convert mW to dBm

How to convert power in milliwatts (mW) to dBm.
The power in dBm is equal to the base 10 logarithm of the power in milliwatts (mW):
P(dBm) = 10 · log10P(mW) / 1mW )
For example: what is the power in dBm for power consumption of 100mW?
Solution:
P(dBm) = 10 · log10( 100mW / 1mW ) = 20dBm

AnchorHow to convert dBm to mW

How to convert power in dBm to milliwatts (mW).
The power in milliwatts (P(mW)) is equal to 10 raised by the power in dBm (P(dBm)) divided by 10?
P(mW) = 1mW · 10(P(dBm) / 10)
For example: what is the power in milliwatts for power consumption of 20dBm?
Solution:
P(mW) = 1mW · 10(20dBm / 10) = 100mW

AnchorHow to convert Watt to dBm

How to convert power in watts (W) to dBm.
The power in dBm is equal to the base 10 logarithm of the power in watts (W) plus 30dB:
P(dBm) = 10 · log10P(W) / 1W ) + 30
For example: what is the power in dBm for power consumption of 100W?
Solution:
P(dBm) = 10 · log10( 100W / 1W ) + 30 = 50dBm

AnchorHow to convert dBm to Watt

How to convert power in dBm to watts (W).
The power in watts (P(W)) is equal to 10 raised by the power in dBm (P(dBm)) minus 30dB divided by 10:
P(W) = 1W · 10( (P(dBm) – 30) / 10)
For example: what is the power in watts for power consumption of 40dBm?
Solution:
P(W) = 1W · 10( (40dBm – 30) / 10) = 10W

AnchorHow to convert dBW to dBm

How to convert power in dBW to dBm.
The power in dBm is equal to the base 10 logarithm of the power in watts (W):
P(dBm) = P(dBW) + 30
For example: what is the power in dBm for power consumption of 20dBW?
Solution:
P(dBm) = 20dBW + 30 = 50dBm

AnchorHow to convert dBm to dBW

How to convert power in dBm to dBW.
The power in dBW (P(dBW)) is equal to 10 raised by the power in dBm (P(dBm)) divided by 10:
P(dBW) = P(dBm) – 30
For example: what is the power in watts for power consumption of 40dBm?
Solution:
P(dBW) = 40dBm – 30 = 10dBW

AnchordBm to Watt, mW, dBW conversion table

Power (dBm) Power (dBW) Power (watt) Power (mW)
-100 dBm -130 dBW 0.1 pW 0.0000000001 mW
-90 dBm -120 dBW 1 pW 0.000000001 mW
-80 dBm -110 dBW 10 pW 0.00000001 mW
-70 dBm -100 dBW 100 pW 0.0000001 mW
-60 dBm -90 dBW 1 nW 0.000001 mW
-50 dBm -80 dBW 10 nW 0.00001 mW
-40 dBm -70 dBW 100 nW 0.0001 mW
-30 dBm -60 dBW 1 μW 0.001 mW
-20 dBm -50 dBW 10 μW 0.01 mW
-10 dBm -40 dBW 100 μW 0.1 mW
-1 dBm   -31 dBW 794 μW 0.794 mW
0 dBm -30 dBW 1.000 mW 1.000 mW
1 dBm -29 dBW 1.259 mW 1.259 mW
10 dBm -20 dBW 10 mW 10 mW
20 dBm -10 dBW 100 mW 100 mW
30 dBm 0 dBW 1 W 1000 mW
40 dBm 10 dBW 10 W 10000 mW
50 dBm 20 dBW 100 W 100000 mW
60 dBm 30 dBW 1 kW 1000000 mW
70 dBm 40 dBW 10 kW 10000000 mW
80 dBm 50 dBW 100 kW 100000000 mW
90 dBm 60 dBW 1 MW 1000000000 mW
100 dBm 70 dBW 10 MW 10000000000 mW

 

As we know that to improve correction capability, more powerful and complex FEC codes must be used. However, the more complex the FEC codes are, the more time FEC decoding will take. This term “baud” originates from the French engineer Emile Baudot, who was the inventor of 5-bit teletype code. The Baud rate actually refers to the number of signal or symbol changes that occurs per second. A symbol is one of the several voltage, frequency, or phase changes.

Baudrate = bitrate/number of bits per symbol ;

signal bandwidth = baud rate;

Baud rate: 

It is the rate symbols which are generated at the source and, to a first approximation, equals to the electronic bandwidth of the transmission system. The baud rate is an important technology-dependent system performance parameter. This parameter defines the optical bandwidth of the transceiver, and it specifies the minimum slot width required for the corresponding flow(s).

Baud rate/symbol rate/transmission rate for a physical layer protocol is the maximum possible number of times a signal can change its state from a logical 1 to logical 0 or or vice-versa per second. These states are usually voltage, frequency, optical intensity or phase. This can also be described as the number of symbols that can be transmitted in 1 second. The relationship between baud rate and bitrate is given as.

Bit rate = baud rate * number of bits / baud

The number of bits per baud is deduced from the existing modulation scheme. Here, we are assuming that the number of bits per baud is one, so, the baud rate is the exactly same as the bit rate.

The spectral-width of the wavelength in GHz is equal to the symbol rate in Gbaud measured at the 3 dB point or the point where the power is half of the peak. As the baud rate increases, the spectral-width of the channels will increases proportionally. The higher baud rates, therefore, are unable to increase spectral efficiency, though there can be exceptions to this rule where a higher baud rate better aligns with the available spectrum. Increasing wavelength capacity with the baud rate, has far less impact on reach than increasing it with higher-order modulation.

Higher baud rates, offer the best potential for reducing the cost per bit in Flexi-grid DWDM networks and also in point-to-point fixed grid networks, even though higher baud rates are not significant in 50 GHz fixed grid ROADM networks. Higher baud rates also requires all the components of the optical interface, including the DSP, photodetector and A/D converters and modulators, to support the higher bandwidth. This places a limit on the maximum baud rate that is achievable with a given set of technology and may increase the cost of the interfaces if more expensive components are required.

Following are the few options that can help increase capacity of an Optical System

  1.  Increasing the signal’s frequency
  2. Increasing the number of fibers
  3. Increasing the number of channels
  4. Increasing the modulation complexity.

The first option would require a proportional increase in bandwidth, while the other options would require the inclusion or replacement of equipment, resulting in higher cost, complexity, and power consumption.

 Following are the major parameters associated with optical light receivers:-

      1. Minimum threshold optical power, minimum sensitivity 
      2. Responsiveness per wavelength
      3. Wavelength discrimination
      4. Receiver bit rate (max-min) 
      5. Min-max threshold level (one-zero) 
      6. Dependency on one’s density
      7. Dependence on polarisation
      8. Demodulation 
      9. Receiver noise
      10. Dependency on bias
      11. Dependency on temperature 

 

 Following are the major parameters associated with optical light sources:

      • OCh output power
      • OCh wavelength AQ
      • Line spacing
      • Cutoff A (tunable sources)
      • Tunability speed (tunable sources)
      • Spectral width (tunable sources)
      • Line width (light sources)
      • Modulation depth (modulated sources)
      •  Bit rate (max-min) (modulated sources) 
      • Source noise
      • Dependency on bias 

Main issues associated with EDFA designs are as follows: 

1. The first issue is the flat gain. As EDFAs do not amplify all wavelengths through them the same; thus, the gain is not exactly flat. 

2. The second issue is the pump power-sharing. The pump power is shared by all wavelengths in the link. Therefore  the more the wavelengths, the lesser power per wavelength will be available. However, as wavelengths can get drop but not added, or some wavelengths get lost due to failures, EDFAs will amplify few wavelengths more. 

 These two issues can be mitigated by properly engineering the WDM system and by dynamic gain control. 

3. The third issue is not as simple and is addressed differently. When engineering a  fiber-optic path, it should be remembered that optical noise sources are cumulative and that the ASE of EDFAs introduces noise that degrades the signal to noise ratio (SIN). Although a strong optical signal launched into the fiber could overcome this, near the zero-dispersion wavelength region, four-wave mixing would become dominant, and it would degrade the SIN ratio.

This is because of the reduction of the minimal distance between two points of the constellation, which reduces the resilience to channel impairments. For instance, going from a PDM-QPSK up to a PDM-16QAM transmission doubles the data rate at the cost of an optical reach divided by a factor of 5.

 

Modulation is the process of encoding information onto a carrier signal, which is then transmitted over a communication channel. The choice of modulation scheme can have a significant impact on the reach of a system, which refers to the maximum distance over which a signal can be transmitted and still be reliably received.

There are several ways in which changing modulation can improve the reach of a system:

Increased spectral efficiency:

Modulation schemes that allow for higher data rates within the same bandwidth can improve the reach of a system by enabling more data to be transmitted over the same distance.

This is achieved by using more complex modulation schemes that allow for more bits to be transmitted per symbol.

Improved resistance to noise:

Some modulation schemes, such as frequency-shift keying (FSK) and phase-shift keying (PSK), are more robust to noise and interference than others.

By using a modulation scheme that is more resistant to noise, a system can improve its reach by reducing the probability of errors in the received signal.

Better use of available power:

Modulation schemes that are more efficient in their use of available power can improve the reach of a system by allowing for longer distances to be covered with the same power output.

For example, amplitude modulation (AM) is less power-efficient than frequency modulation (FM), which means that FM can be used to transmit signals over longer distances with the same power output.

Overall, changing modulation can improve the reach of a system by enabling more data to be transmitted over longer distances with greater reliability and efficiency.

SE is defined as the information capacity of a single channel (in bit/s) divided by the frequency spacing Δf (in Hz) between the carriers of the  WDM comb: 

SE = Rs log2(M) /Δf (1+r) 

where Rs is the symbol rate, M is the number of constellation points of the modulation format, and r is the redundancy of the forward error correction (FEC) code, for example, r = 0.07 for an FEC with overhead (OH) equal to 7% 

The following effects are the main sources of Q factor fluctuations:

PDL(polarization-dependent loss):

This corresponds to the dependence of the insertion loss of passive components to the signal state of polarization (SOP).

PHB (polarization hole burning): 

This corresponds to the dependence of the optical amplifier gain to the signal SOP. The PHB is an effect that is significant in single-wavelength transmission since the degree of polarization (DOP) of a laser source is close to 100% unless a polarization scrambler is used. In WDM transmission systems, including a large number of wavelengths, however, the DOP of the optical stream is close to 0% due to the random distribution of the different wavelengths SOP. This effect becomes, therefore, negligible in a WDM transmission system.

The signal transmission quality is not stable over a long period of time because of the polarization effects occurring along the propagation path. The Time-varying system performance (TVSP) is deduced from testbed experiments where the fluctuations of the Q-factor are measured over a prolonged period of time. From this measurement, a Gaussian distribution is fitted to the measurements in order to deduce the standard deviation (s) and the average (mean Q) of the Q-factor distribution.

The optical spectrum analyzer (OSA) is the device typically used to measure OSNR. Signal and noise measurements are made over a specific spectral bandwidth Br , which is referred to as the OSA’s resolution bandwidth (RBW). The RBW filter acts as a bandpass filter allowing only the set amount of light spectrum to strike the OSA’s photodetector. The photodetector measures the average optical power in the spectral width. It cannot discriminate between two separate signals in the RBW spectrum. If there is more than one signal in RBW, it will treat and display them as one. Therefore, the ability of an OSA to display two closely spaced signals as two distinct signals is determined by the RBW setting. Typically, an OSA’s RBW range is adjustable between 10 and 0.01 nm with common settings of 1.0, 0.5, 0.1, and 0.05 nm.

  • High Chromatic Dispersion (CD) Robustness
  • Can avoid Dispersion Compensation Units (DCUs)
  • No need to have precise Fiber Characterization
  • Simpler Network Design
  • Latency improvement due to no DCUs
  • High Polarization Mode Dispersion (PMD) Robustness
  • High Bit Rate Wavelengths deployable on all Fiber types
  • No need for “fancy”PMD Compensator devices
  • No need to have precise Fiber Characterization
  • Low Optical Signal-to-Noise Ratio (OSNR) Needed
  • More capacity at greater distances w/o OEO Regeneration
  • Possibility to launch lower per-channel Power
  • Higher tolerance to Channels Interferences

Electronic Dispersion Compensation (EDC)

EDC is a technology that can help overcome the power losses that occur in optical link budgets. These losses can be caused by various factors such as inter-symbol interference (ISI) due to fiber chromatic and polarization mode dispersion, transmitter impairments, and limitations in the bandwidth of the optical or electronic components of the transmitter or receiver.

Two types of DCM are used in the DWDM link and are called post-compensation and pre-compensation. Since DCMs are considered part of the transmission line, the prefixes “post-” (after) and “pre-” (before) refers to the section of the transmission line that requires the compensation. 

 For the post-compensation DCM deployment, DCMs are placed after the fiber span that needs compensation. For G.652 fiber compensation, dispersion remains positive throughout the link. 

Following are factors contributing in DWDM design to increasing chromatic dispersion signal distortion

1. Laser spectral width, modulation method, and frequency chirp. Lasers with wider spectral widths and chirp have shorter dispersion limits. It is important to refer to manufacturer specifications to determine the total amount of dispersion that can be tolerated by the light wave equipment.

Introduction

Chromatic dispersion (CD) is a phenomenon in optical communication where different wavelengths of light travel at different speeds, causing the light pulses to spread and overlap. This dispersion can lead to signal distortion and degradation. In the realm of optical communication, both multi-channel Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM) systems and single-channel systems like Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH) and Ethernet links on fiber are affected by chromatic dispersion. In this blog, we’ll delve into how CD impacts these systems differently and the measures taken to mitigate its effects.

Understanding Chromatic Dispersion

Chromatic dispersion occurs due to the varying refractive indices of different wavelengths of light in an optical fiber. This dispersion effect is a challenge in high-capacity optical networks, where accurate transmission of data is crucial.

Impact on Multi-Channel DWDM Systems

Multi-channel DWDM systems use multiple wavelengths to transmit data concurrently over a single optical fiber. In these systems, each channel experiences its own level of chromatic dispersion, leading to inter-symbol interference. The impact of CD becomes more pronounced as the number of channels increases. To counter this, DWDM systems employ techniques like dispersion compensating fibers (DCF) and advanced modulation formats to manage dispersion and enhance signal quality.

Effects on Single-Channel Systems

Single-channel systems, such as SDH and Ethernet links on fiber, transmit data using a single wavelength. While these systems are less susceptible to the complexities of multi-channel CD, they are not immune to dispersion-related issues. CD can still lead to signal distortion and limit transmission distances. To address this, SDH and Ethernet systems incorporate forward error correction (FEC) techniques, signal regeneration, and proper design considerations to ensure reliable data transmission.

Mitigation Strategies

In multi-channel DWDM systems, compensating for CD involves careful engineering and deployment of dispersion compensation modules and other advanced techniques. Single-channel systems typically use FEC algorithms to correct errors introduced by CD. Additionally, hybrid systems may utilize a combination of dispersion compensation and FEC techniques for optimal performance.

Conclusion

Chromatic dispersion is a challenge faced by both multi-channel DWDM systems and single-channel systems like SDH and Ethernet links on fiber. While the complexities of CD are more pronounced in multi-channel systems due to the varying wavelengths, single-channel systems are not exempt from its effects. Both types of systems rely on sophisticated mitigation strategies, such as dispersion compensation modules and FEC algorithms, to ensure reliable and high-quality data transmission. As optical communication technology advances, effective management of chromatic dispersion continues to be a critical consideration for network engineers and designers.

Introduction

Optical amplifiers play a crucial role in modern communication networks by boosting optical signals without converting them into electrical signals. To ensure optimal performance, it’s essential to understand the various performance parameters that define an optical amplifier’s capabilities.

Operating Wavelength Range

The operating wavelength range refers to the range of wavelengths within which the optical amplifier can effectively amplify signals. This parameter is determined by the amplifier’s design and the properties of the gain medium. The amplifier’s performance can degrade if signals fall outside this range, emphasizing the need to choose an amplifier suitable for the specific wavelength range of your network.

Nominal Input Power Range

The nominal input power range represents the power levels at which the optical amplifier operates optimally. If the input power exceeds this range, it can lead to signal distortion, nonlinear effects, or even damage to the amplifier components. Keeping input power within the specified range is essential for maintaining signal quality and amplifier longevity.

Input Range per Channel

In wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM) systems, different channels carry signals at varying wavelengths. The input range per channel defines the range of power levels for each individual channel. This parameter ensures that channels remain isolated from each other to prevent interference and crosstalk.

Nominal Single Wavelength Input Optical Power

For a single wavelength channel, the nominal input optical power indicates the ideal power level for optimal amplification. Operating too far below or above this power level can result in suboptimal performance, affecting signal quality and efficiency.

Nominal Single Wavelength Output Optical Power

Similar to the input power, the nominal single wavelength output optical power signifies the desired output power level for a single wavelength channel. This parameter ensures that the amplified signal has sufficient power for further transmission without introducing excessive noise or distortion.

Noise Figure

Noise figure characterizes the amount of noise added to the signal during the amplification process. A lower noise figure indicates better signal quality. Minimizing noise figure is vital to maintaining a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and overall system performance.

Nominal Gain

Amplifier gain represents the factor by which the input signal’s power is increased. It’s a measure of amplification efficiency. Properly controlling and optimizing gain levels is crucial for achieving the desired signal strength while avoiding signal saturation or distortion.

Gain Response Time on Adding/Dropping Channels

In dynamic networks, channels may be added or dropped frequently. The gain response time defines how quickly the amplifier adjusts to these changes without causing signal disruptions. A faster gain response time enhances network flexibility and efficiency.

Channel Gain

Channels in a WDM system may experience different levels of gain due to variations in amplifier characteristics. Maintaining uniform channel gain is essential to ensure consistent signal quality across all channels.

Gain Flatness

Gain flatness refers to the consistency of gain across the amplifier’s operating wavelength range. Fluctuations in gain can lead to signal distortions, impacting network performance. Techniques such as gain equalization are used to achieve a flat gain profile.

Input Reflectance

Input reflectance is the portion of the incident signal that is reflected back into the amplifier. High input reflectance can lead to signal degradation and instability. Implementing anti-reflective coatings and proper fiber connectors helps minimize input reflectance.

Output Reflectance

Output reflectance refers to the amount of signal reflected back from the output of the amplifier. Excessive output reflectance can lead to signal feedback and instability. Output isolators and terminations are used to manage and reduce output reflectance.

Maximum Reflectance Tolerance at Input/Output

To maintain signal integrity, the maximum acceptable levels of reflectance at both input and output ports must be defined. Exceeding these tolerance levels can result in signal degradation and network disruptions.

Multi-channel Gain Slope

In multi-channel systems, variations in gain levels across different wavelengths can lead to unequal channel performance. Proper management of multi-channel gain slope ensures uniform amplification across all channels.

Polarization Dependent Loss

Polarization dependent loss (PDL) occurs when the amplifier’s performance varies with the polarization state of the incoming signal. Minimizing PDL is crucial to prevent signal quality discrepancies based on polarization.

Gain Tilt

Gain tilt refers to the non-uniform gain across the amplifier’s wavelength range. This can impact signal quality and transmission efficiency. Techniques such as using gain-flattening filters help achieve a more balanced gain distribution.

Gain Ripple

Gain ripple represents small fluctuations in gain across the amplifier’s operating range. Excessive gain ripple can cause signal distortions and affect network performance. Implementing gain equalization techniques minimizes gain ripple.

Conclusion

Understanding and optimizing these performance parameters is essential for ensuring the efficiency, reliability, and overall performance of optical amplifiers in complex communication networks. By carefully managing these parameters, network operators can achieve seamless transmission of data and maximize the potential of optical amplifier technology.

What is  CD?                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Chromatic dispersion (CD) is a property of optical fiber (or optical component) that causes different wavelengths of a light source to propagate at different velocities, means if transmitting signal, from a LASER source, this LASER source having spectral width and emit different wavelengths apart from its center wavelength. Since all light sources consist of a narrow spectrum of light (comprising of many wavelengths), all fiber transmissions are affected by chromatic dispersion to some degree. In addition, any signal modulating a light source results in its spectral broadening and hence exacerbating the chromatic dispersion effect. Since each wavelength of a signal pulse propagates in a fiber at a slightly different velocity, each wavelength arrives at the fiber end at a different time. This results in signal pulse spreading, which leads two inter-symbol Interference between pulses and increases bit errors

What is cause of CD?

Chromatic dispersion is due to an inherent property of silica optical fiber. The speed of a light wave depends on the refractive index, n, of the medium within which it is traversing. In silica optical fiber, as well as many other materials, n changes as a function of wavelength. Thus, different wavelengths travel at slightly different speeds along the optical fiber. A wavelength pulse is composed of several wavelength components or spectra. Each of its spectral constituents travel at slightly different speeds within the optical fiber. The result is a spreading of the transmission pulse as it travels through the optical fiber.

What is unit of CD and CD Coefficient?         

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          The chromatic dispersion (CD) parameter is a measure of signal pulse spread in a fiber due to this effect. It is expressed with ps/nm units, where the picoseconds refer to the                    Signal pulse spread in time and the nanometers refer to the signal’s spectral width. Chromatic dispersion can also be expressed as fiber length multiplied by proportionality                  

Coefficient. This coefficient is referred to as the chromatic dispersion coefficient and is measured in units of picoseconds per nanometer times kilometer, ps/(nm km). It is                                          

Typically specified by the fiber the cable manufacturer and represents the chromatic dispersion characteristic for a 1 km length of fiber.

Which are main factors for CD?                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        

Chromatic dispersion affects all optical transmissions to some degree. These effects become more pronounced as the transmission rate increases and fiber length increases.

Factors contributing to increasing chromatic dispersion signal distortion include the following:

1. Laser spectral width, modulation method, and frequency  chirp. Lasers with wider spectral widths and chirp have shorter dispersion limits. It is important to refer to manufacturer specifications to determine the total amount of dispersion that can be tolerated by the lightwave equipment.

2. The wavelength of the optical signal. Chromatic dispersion varies with wavelength in a fiber. In a standard non-dispersion shifted fiber (NDSF G.652), chromatic dispersion is near or at zero at 1310 nm. It increases positively with increasing wavelength and increases negatively for wavelengths less than 1310 nm.

3. The optical bit rate of the transmission laser. The higher the fiber bit rate, the greater the signal distortion effect.
4. The chromatic dispersion characteristics of fiber used in the link. Different types of fiber have different dispersion characteristics.
5. The total fiber link length, since the effect is cumulative along the length of the fiber.
6. Any other devices in the link that can change the link’s total chromatic dispersion including chromatic dispersion compensation modules.
7. Temperature changes of the fiber or fiber cable can cause small changes to chromatic dispersion. Refer to the manufacturer’s fiber cable specifications for values.

 How to mitigate CD in a link?

 

1. Change the equipment laser with a laser that has a specified longer dispersion limit. This is typically a laser with a narrower spectral width or a laser that has some form of pre-compensation. As laser spectral width decreases, chromatic dispersion limit increases.

2. For new construction, deploy NZ-DSF instead of SSMF fiber.NZ-DSF has a lower chromatic dispersion specification.

3. Insert chromatic dispersion compensation modules (DCM) into the fiber link to compensate for the excessive dispersion. The optical loss of the DCM must be added to the link optical loss budget and optical amplifiers may be required to compensate.

4. Deploy a 3R optical repeater (re-amplify, reshape, and retime the signal) once a link reaches chromatic dispersion equipment limit.

5. For long haul undersea fiber deployment, splicing in alternating lengths of dispersion compensating fiber can be considered.

6. To reduce chromatic dispersion variance due to temperature, buried cable is preferred over exposed aerial cable.

Introduction:

In the realm of optical communication, precision and reliability are paramount. Amidst the intricate components and techniques that ensure seamless data transmission, Differential Group Delay (DGD) emerges as a critical factor. This article takes you on a journey through the intricacies of DGD, unraveling its definition, implications, measurement techniques, and strategies for effective management. By the end, you’ll not only understand the concept of DGD but also appreciate its significance in maintaining the integrity of optical signals.

What is Differential Group Delay (DGD)?

Differential Group Delay (DGD) refers to the time difference between two orthogonal polarization states of an optical signal as it traverses a medium, such as a fiber-optic cable. This phenomenon arises due to various factors, including birefringence within the optical components and environmental conditions. DGD has the potential to degrade signal quality, leading to signal distortion, reduced data rates, and increased bit error rates.

The Role of DGD in Optical Communication:

DGD’s impact on optical communication is profound, influencing the overall system performance in multiple ways:

1. Signal Distortion:

DGD can cause pulse spreading and overlapping, leading to signal distortion and compromised data integrity.

2. Dispersion Compensation Challenges:

In high-speed optical systems, DGD poses challenges to dispersion compensation techniques, affecting data transmission over long distances.

3. Bit Error Rate (BER) Increase:

As DGD grows, the probability of bit errors occurring within the signal rises, directly impacting the reliability of the communication link.

4. System Robustness:

Managing DGD is crucial for ensuring the robustness of optical systems against external factors, such as temperature variations and mechanical stress.

Measuring Differential Group Delay: Techniques and Insights

Measuring DGD accurately is essential for identifying potential signal degradation and implementing effective mitigation strategies. Several techniques are employed for DGD measurement:

1. Interferometric Methods:

Interferometric techniques exploit interference between two orthogonal polarization states to determine DGD with high precision.

2. Time-Domain Methods:

Time-domain methods involve introducing a known time delay between polarization states and measuring the resultant phase difference.

3. Spectral Analysis:

Spectral analysis techniques utilize the spectral characteristics of the signal to calculate DGD based on phase variations.

Managing DGD: Strategies for Enhanced Signal Integrity

Efficiently managing DGD is imperative for maintaining optimal signal quality and system performance:

1. Polarization Mode Dispersion (PMD) Compensation:

Sophisticated PMD compensation techniques, such as adaptive compensation, can mitigate the effects of DGD.

2. Dispersion Compensation Modules:

Incorporating dispersion compensation modules helps counteract signal distortion caused by DGD.

3. Modulation Formats:

Selecting appropriate modulation formats can enhance the system’s tolerance to DGD-induced signal degradation.

4. Monitoring and Feedback:

Implementing real-time monitoring and feedback mechanisms enables dynamic adjustments to mitigate DGD-related issues.

Frequently Asked Questions about Differential Group Delay (DGD):

  • Why does DGD occur in optical communication? DGD arises from the time delay difference between orthogonal polarization states caused by factors like fiber birefringence.
  • How does DGD affect data transmission? DGD can lead to signal distortion, dispersion challenges, increased BER, and reduced system performance.
  • What are the consequences of high DGD values? High DGD values can result in significant signal degradation, making reliable communication challenging.
  • Can DGD be entirely eliminated? While complete elimination is challenging, effective mitigation strategies can minimize DGD’s impact on signal quality.

 Polarization mode dispersion (PMD) is a property of a single-mode fiber or an optical component where pulse spreading is caused by different propagation velocities of the signal’s two orthogonal polarizations. Optical fibers or optical components can be modeled with two orthogonal polarization axes called principal states of polarization (PSP). 

 

An optical signal propagating in a fiber is resolved into these two PSP axes. Each polarization axis (fast and slow axis) has a different propagation velocity. This is due to different refractive indexes in each axis caused by the birefringence of the material. The different velocities lead to pulse spreading at the receiver end.

 

 

PMD can be expressed as the square root of the fiber length multiplied by a proportionality coefficient. This coefficient is referred to as the PMD coefficient and is measured in units of picoseconds per square root kilometer (ps/√km). The PMD coefficient is typically specified by fiber cable manufacturers and represents the PMD characteristic for a particular length of that fiber.

Fiber characterization can be defined as the field measurement and recording of fiber span parameters that affect signal transmission over all or selected operating wavelengths. These measured parameters provide a true picture of the fiber span’s transmission limitations. They are used in network planning to ensure transmission links are designed within transceiver operating budgets and limits. Full fiber characterization is often necessary in modern high-speed link designs, where optical budgets are stretched to their maximum with little or no margin for error. Fiber quality can also be assessed with these parameters. Fiber characterization is performed after new fiber cable link construction, dark fiber purchase, or lease. This helps to ensure the fiber quality meets or exceeds required specifications and expectations. It also documents fiber parameters at the time of construction or acquisition for comparison with future measurements to determine fiber degradation due to aging, damage, and repair.

Macro bending: Macrobending is the attenuation associated with bending or wrapping the fiber. Light can “leak out” of a fiber when it is bent. As the bend becomes tighter, more light escapes. Macrobending loss, measured in decibels, increases at longer wavelengths where the optical confinement of the light is weaker. It also increases linearly with the number of turns. Traditionally, macrobending was not a limiting effect when cables were mostly of loose-tube or ribbon design and installed into ducts. The tightest bends incurred by fibers were in splice trays, where excess fiber would be stored in loops after jointing. This was reflected in the macrobending specification of ITU-T Recommendation G.652, where a minimum bend radius of 30 mm was defined to reflect typical splice tray dimensions and 100 turns were agreed upon to simulate the total excess fiber from all the splice sites between repeaters. But macrobending effects become more pronounced in networks installed close-to and within the building. Prevalent in this segment of the network are low-diameter mini-cables that are stripped-back designs, compared to the traditional sheathed loose-tube and ribbon cables. Lightweight and highly flexible, these new designs are preferred for their space efficiency (when installed into commensurately small micro-ducts) and ease of handling and routing (when installed on the inside and outside of buildings along tortuous paths). Bend radii of much less than 30 mm therefore have become commonplace.

Micro bending :Microbending attenuation of an optical fiber relates to the light signal loss associated with lateral stresses along the length of the fiber. The loss is due to the coupling from the fiber’s guided fundamental mode to lossy, higher-order radiation modes. Mode coupling occurs when fibers suffer small random bends along

the fiber axes. This random bending is usually caused by external mechanical stresses against the cable material that compress the fiber. The result is random, high-frequency perturbations to the fiber. Lateral stresses can be caused by pressure induced by manufacturing or installation or by temperature-induced dimensional changes in cabling materials that cause undesirable fiber/fiber or fiber/cable material interactions. These interactions can give rise to random microscopic bends or curvatures of <1-mm radius that create very small displacements of the fiber core from the fiber axis. Microbending effects can be seen at all the commonly used wavelengths in single mode fibers (1310, 1550, and 1625 nm), whereas macrobending effects are seen predominantly at 1550 and 1625 nm.

Latency is a time delay experienced in system and it describes how long it takes for data to get from transmission side to receiver side. In a fiber optical communication system, it is essentially the length of optical fiber divided by the speed of light in fiber core, supplemented with delay induced by optical and electro optical elements plus any extra processing time required by system, also called overhead. Signal processing delay can be reduced by using parallel processing based on large scale integration CMOS technologies.

Added to the latency due to propagation in the fiber, there are other path building blocks that affect the total data transport time. These elements include

  •   opto-electrical conversion,
  •   switching and routing,
  •   signal regeneration,
  •   Amplification,
  •   chromatic dispersion (CD) compensation,
  •   polarization mode dispersion (PMD) compensation,
  •   data packing, digital signal processing (DSP),
  •   protocols and addition forward error correction (FEC)

Significance

ITU-T Standards

Characteristics

Wavelength Coverage

Applications

50/125µm Graded-Index Multimode Fiber for FTTH Systems

G.651.1

Cladding Diameter & Core Diameter:

125 ±2 µm; 50 ±3 µm

Macrobend loss: 15mm

Attenuation:

“Max at 850 nm: 1 dB

Max at 1300 nm: 1 dB

Max at 850 nm: 3.5 dB/km

Max at 1300 nm: 1.0 dB/km”

850 nm;

1300 nm

Support FTTH and FTTZ architectures; Recommend the use of quartz multimode fiber for access networks in specific environments.

Standard Single-Mode Fiber for CWDM Systems

G.652.A

Max PMDQ=0.5 ps/√ km

O and C bands

Support applications such as those recommended in ITU-T G.957 and G.691 up to STM-16, as well as 10 Gbit/s up to 40 km(Ethernet) and STM-256 for ITU-T G.693.

G.652.B

Maximum attenuation specified at 1625 nm.

Max PMDQ=0.2 ps/√ km

O, C and L bands

Support higher bit-rate applications up to STM-64, such as some in ITU-T G.691 and G.692, and STM-256 for applications in ITU-T G.693 and G.959.1.

G.652.C

Maximum attenuation specified at 1383 nm (equal or lower than 1310 nm).

Max PMDQ=0.5 ps/√ km

O, E, S, C and L bands

Similar to G.652.A, but this standard allows transmission in portions of an extended wavelength range from 1360 nm to 1530 nm. Suitable for CWDM systems.

G.652.D

Maximum attenuation specified from 1310 to 1625 nm. Maximum attenuation specified at 1383 nm (equal or lower than 1310 nm).

Max PMDQ=0.2 ps/√ km

O, E, S, C and L bands

Similar to G.652.B, but this standard allows transmission in portions of an extended wavelength range from 1360 nm to 1530 nm. Suitable for CWDM systems.

Dispersion-Shifted Single-mode Optical Fiber for Long Haul Transmission

G.653.A

Zero chromatic dispersion value at 1550 nm. Maximum attenuation of 0.35 dB/km at 1550 nm. Max PMDQ=0.5 ps/√ km

1550 nm

Supports high bit rate applications at 1550 nm over long distances.

G.653.B

Maximum attenuation specified at 1550 nm only. Max PMDQ=0.2 ps/√ km

1550 nm

With a low PMD coefficient, this standard supports higher bit rate transmission applications than G.653.A.

Cut-off Shifted Single-mode Fiber for Long Haul Submarine & Terrestrial Networks

G.654.A

Maximum attenuation of 0.22 dB/km at 1550 nm.

Max PMDQ=0.5 ps/√ km

1550 nm

Suited for long-distance digital transmission applications, such as long-haul terrestrial line systems and submarine cable systems using an optical amplifier.

G.654.B

Maximum attenuation of 0.22 dB/km at 1550 nm.

Max PMDQ=0.20 ps/√ km

1550 nm

Same ITU-T system as G.654.A and for ITU-T G.69.1 long-haul applications in the 1550 nm region. Also suited for longer distance and larger WDM repeaterless submarine systems with remotely pumped optical amplifiers in G.973. Also, for submarine systems with optical amplifiers in G.977

G.654.C

Maximum attenuation of 0.22 dB/km at 1550 nm.

Max PMDQ=0.20 ps/√ km

1550 nm

Suited for higher bit-rate and long-haul applications in G.959.1.

G.654.D

Maximum attenuation of 0.20 dB/km at 1550 nm.

Max PMDQ=0.20 ps/√ km

1550 nm

Suited for higher bit-rate submarine systems in G.973, G.973.1, G.973.2, and G.977.

G.654.E

Maximum attenuation of 0.23dB/km at 1550nm.

Max PMDQ=0.20 ps/√ km

1550 nm

Similar to ITU-T G.654.B, but has a smaller macrobending loss specification equivalent to ITU-T G.652.D fibers, and a tightened range of nominal MFD. For deployment as terrestrial cables with improved OSNR characteristics to support higher bit-rate coherent transmission, e.g., 100G/200G/400G systems.

Legacy Long Haul Single-mode Fiber for CWDM System

G.655.A

Maximum attenuation at 1550 nm only. Lower CD value than B and C category. Max

C band

Support DWDM transmission (G.692) applications in the C band with down to 200GHz channel spacing.

G.655.B

Maximum attenuation specified at 1550 and 1625 nm. Max PMDQ=0.5 ps/√ km

C+L band

Support DWDM transmission (G.692) applications in the C+L band with down to 100GHz channel spacing.

G.655.C

Maximum attenuation specified at 1550 and 1625 nm. Max PMDQ=0.2 ps/√ km

O to C band

Similar to G.655.B, but allows for transmission applications at high bit rates for STM-64 (10 Gbps) up to 2000 km. Also suitable for STM-256 (40 Gbps).

G.655.D

Maximum attenuation specified at 1550 and 1625 nm. Max PMDQ=0.2 ps/√ km

C+L band

For wavelengths greater than 1530 nm. Similar applications to G.655.B are supported. For wavelength, less than 1530 nm, can support CWDM applications at channels 1471 nm and higher.

G.655.E

Maximum attenuation specified at 1550 and 1625 nm. Max PMDQ=0.2 ps/√ km

C+L band

Similar to G.655.D, but have higher CD values for applications with small channel spacing.

Non-zero Dispersion Fiber for CWDM and DWDM System

G.656

Maximum attenuation at 1460, 1550, and 1625 nm. Max PMDQ=0.2 ps/√ km

S, C and L band

Supports both CWDM and DWDM systems throughout the wavelength range of 1460 nm to 1625 nm.

Bend-insensitive Single-mode Fiber for FTTH Systems

G.657.A

At 15 mm radius, 10 turns, 0.25 dB max at 1550 nm, 1 dB max at 1625 nm. Max PMDQ=0.20 ps/√ km

from O to L band

Optimized access installation with respect to macro bending, loss, other parameters being similar to G.652.D.

G.657.B

At 15 mm radius, 10 turns, 0.03 dB max at 1550 nm, 0.1 dB max at 1625 nm

from O to L band

Supports optimized access network installation with very small bending radii applied in fiber management systems and particularly for restricted distance installations.