1. The first issue is the flat gain. As EDFAs do not amplify all wavelengths through them the same; thus, the gain is not exactly flat.
2. The second issue is the pump power-sharing. The pump power is shared by all wavelengths in the link. Therefore the more the wavelengths, the lesser power per wavelength will be available. However, as wavelengths can get drop but not added, or some wavelengths get lost due to failures, EDFAs will amplify few wavelengths more.
3. The third issue is not as simple and is addressed differently. When engineering a fiber-optic path, it should be remembered that optical noise sources are cumulative and that the ASE of EDFAs introduces noise that degrades the signal to noise ratio (SIN). Although a strong optical signal launched into the fiber could overcome this, near the zero-dispersion wavelength region, four-wave mixing would become dominant, and it would degrade the SIN ratio.
This is because of the reduction of the minimal distance between two points of the constellation, which reduces the resilience to channel impairments. For instance, going from a PDM-QPSK up to a PDM-16QAM transmission doubles the data rate at the cost of an optical reach divided by a factor of 5.
Modulation is the process of encoding information onto a carrier signal, which is then transmitted over a communication channel. The choice of modulation scheme can have a significant impact on the reach of a system, which refers to the maximum distance over which a signal can be transmitted and still be reliably received.
There are several ways in which changing modulation can improve the reach of a system:
Increased spectral efficiency:
Modulation schemes that allow for higher data rates within the same bandwidth can improve the reach of a system by enabling more data to be transmitted over the same distance.
This is achieved by using more complex modulation schemes that allow for more bits to be transmitted per symbol.
Improved resistance to noise:
Some modulation schemes, such as frequency-shift keying (FSK) and phase-shift keying (PSK), are more robust to noise and interference than others.
By using a modulation scheme that is more resistant to noise, a system can improve its reach by reducing the probability of errors in the received signal.
Better use of available power:
Modulation schemes that are more efficient in their use of available power can improve the reach of a system by allowing for longer distances to be covered with the same power output.
For example, amplitude modulation (AM) is less power-efficient than frequency modulation (FM), which means that FM can be used to transmit signals over longer distances with the same power output.
Overall, changing modulation can improve the reach of a system by enabling more data to be transmitted over longer distances with greater reliability and efficiency.
SE is defined as the information capacity of a single channel (in bit/s) divided by the frequency spacing Δf (in Hz) between the carriers of the WDM comb:
SE = Rs log2(M) /Δf (1+r)
where Rs is the symbol rate, M is the number of constellation points of the modulation format, and r is the redundancy of the forward error correction (FEC) code, for example, r = 0.07 for an FEC with overhead (OH) equal to 7%
PDL(polarization-dependent loss):
This corresponds to the dependence of the insertion loss of passive components to the signal state of polarization (SOP).
PHB (polarization hole burning):
This corresponds to the dependence of the optical amplifier gain to the signal SOP. The PHB is an effect that is significant in single-wavelength transmission since the degree of polarization (DOP) of a laser source is close to 100% unless a polarization scrambler is used. In WDM transmission systems, including a large number of wavelengths, however, the DOP of the optical stream is close to 0% due to the random distribution of the different wavelengths SOP. This effect becomes, therefore, negligible in a WDM transmission system.
The signal transmission quality is not stable over a long period of time because of the polarization effects occurring along the propagation path. The Time-varying system performance (TVSP) is deduced from testbed experiments where the fluctuations of the Q-factor are measured over a prolonged period of time. From this measurement, a Gaussian distribution is fitted to the measurements in order to deduce the standard deviation (s) and the average (mean Q) of the Q-factor distribution.
The optical spectrum analyzer (OSA) is the device typically used to measure OSNR. Signal and noise measurements are made over a specific spectral bandwidth Br , which is referred to as the OSA’s resolution bandwidth (RBW). The RBW filter acts as a bandpass filter allowing only the set amount of light spectrum to strike the OSA’s photodetector. The photodetector measures the average optical power in the spectral width. It cannot discriminate between two separate signals in the RBW spectrum. If there is more than one signal in RBW, it will treat and display them as one. Therefore, the ability of an OSA to display two closely spaced signals as two distinct signals is determined by the RBW setting. Typically, an OSA’s RBW range is adjustable between 10 and 0.01 nm with common settings of 1.0, 0.5, 0.1, and 0.05 nm.
Active sources such as optical plugs,lasers, receivers, and amplifiers generate noise in the fiber link.
Passive sources such as connectors, fiber, splices, and WDMs cause interference by distorting or reflecting the propagating signal power.
Compared with requirements for EDFAs for terrestrial applications and for Submarine applications, there are major important differences making the two types of amplifiers definitely two different components.
EDC is a technology that can help overcome the power losses that occur in optical link budgets. These losses can be caused by various factors such as inter-symbol interference (ISI) due to fiber chromatic and polarization mode dispersion, transmitter impairments, and limitations in the bandwidth of the optical or electronic components of the transmitter or receiver.
Two types of DCM are used in the DWDM link and are called post-compensation and pre-compensation. Since DCMs are considered part of the transmission line, the prefixes “post-” (after) and “pre-” (before) refers to the section of the transmission line that requires the compensation.
For the post-compensation DCM deployment, DCMs are placed after the fiber span that needs compensation. For G.652 fiber compensation, dispersion remains positive throughout the link.
Chromatic dispersion compensation modules (DCM), also known as dispersion compensation units (DCU) or Dispersion slope compensation module (DSCM), can be added to an existing fiber link to compensate for high link dispersion totals.
1. Laser spectral width, modulation method, and frequency chirp. Lasers with wider spectral widths and chirp have shorter dispersion limits. It is important to refer to manufacturer specifications to determine the total amount of dispersion that can be tolerated by the light wave equipment.
Chromatic dispersion (CD) is a phenomenon in optical communication where different wavelengths of light travel at different speeds, causing the light pulses to spread and overlap. This dispersion can lead to signal distortion and degradation. In the realm of optical communication, both multi-channel Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM) systems and single-channel systems like Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH) and Ethernet links on fiber are affected by chromatic dispersion. In this blog, we’ll delve into how CD impacts these systems differently and the measures taken to mitigate its effects.
Chromatic dispersion occurs due to the varying refractive indices of different wavelengths of light in an optical fiber. This dispersion effect is a challenge in high-capacity optical networks, where accurate transmission of data is crucial.
Multi-channel DWDM systems use multiple wavelengths to transmit data concurrently over a single optical fiber. In these systems, each channel experiences its own level of chromatic dispersion, leading to inter-symbol interference. The impact of CD becomes more pronounced as the number of channels increases. To counter this, DWDM systems employ techniques like dispersion compensating fibers (DCF) and advanced modulation formats to manage dispersion and enhance signal quality.
Single-channel systems, such as SDH and Ethernet links on fiber, transmit data using a single wavelength. While these systems are less susceptible to the complexities of multi-channel CD, they are not immune to dispersion-related issues. CD can still lead to signal distortion and limit transmission distances. To address this, SDH and Ethernet systems incorporate forward error correction (FEC) techniques, signal regeneration, and proper design considerations to ensure reliable data transmission.
In multi-channel DWDM systems, compensating for CD involves careful engineering and deployment of dispersion compensation modules and other advanced techniques. Single-channel systems typically use FEC algorithms to correct errors introduced by CD. Additionally, hybrid systems may utilize a combination of dispersion compensation and FEC techniques for optimal performance.
Chromatic dispersion is a challenge faced by both multi-channel DWDM systems and single-channel systems like SDH and Ethernet links on fiber. While the complexities of CD are more pronounced in multi-channel systems due to the varying wavelengths, single-channel systems are not exempt from its effects. Both types of systems rely on sophisticated mitigation strategies, such as dispersion compensation modules and FEC algorithms, to ensure reliable and high-quality data transmission. As optical communication technology advances, effective management of chromatic dispersion continues to be a critical consideration for network engineers and designers.
Optical amplifiers play a crucial role in modern communication networks by boosting optical signals without converting them into electrical signals. To ensure optimal performance, it’s essential to understand the various performance parameters that define an optical amplifier’s capabilities.
The operating wavelength range refers to the range of wavelengths within which the optical amplifier can effectively amplify signals. This parameter is determined by the amplifier’s design and the properties of the gain medium. The amplifier’s performance can degrade if signals fall outside this range, emphasizing the need to choose an amplifier suitable for the specific wavelength range of your network.
Nominal Input Power Range
The nominal input power range represents the power levels at which the optical amplifier operates optimally. If the input power exceeds this range, it can lead to signal distortion, nonlinear effects, or even damage to the amplifier components. Keeping input power within the specified range is essential for maintaining signal quality and amplifier longevity.
Input Range per Channel
In wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM) systems, different channels carry signals at varying wavelengths. The input range per channel defines the range of power levels for each individual channel. This parameter ensures that channels remain isolated from each other to prevent interference and crosstalk.
Nominal Single Wavelength Input Optical Power
For a single wavelength channel, the nominal input optical power indicates the ideal power level for optimal amplification. Operating too far below or above this power level can result in suboptimal performance, affecting signal quality and efficiency.
Nominal Single Wavelength Output Optical Power
Similar to the input power, the nominal single wavelength output optical power signifies the desired output power level for a single wavelength channel. This parameter ensures that the amplified signal has sufficient power for further transmission without introducing excessive noise or distortion.
Noise Figure
Noise figure characterizes the amount of noise added to the signal during the amplification process. A lower noise figure indicates better signal quality. Minimizing noise figure is vital to maintaining a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and overall system performance.
Nominal Gain
Amplifier gain represents the factor by which the input signal’s power is increased. It’s a measure of amplification efficiency. Properly controlling and optimizing gain levels is crucial for achieving the desired signal strength while avoiding signal saturation or distortion.
Gain Response Time on Adding/Dropping Channels
In dynamic networks, channels may be added or dropped frequently. The gain response time defines how quickly the amplifier adjusts to these changes without causing signal disruptions. A faster gain response time enhances network flexibility and efficiency.
Channel Gain
Channels in a WDM system may experience different levels of gain due to variations in amplifier characteristics. Maintaining uniform channel gain is essential to ensure consistent signal quality across all channels.
Gain Flatness
Gain flatness refers to the consistency of gain across the amplifier’s operating wavelength range. Fluctuations in gain can lead to signal distortions, impacting network performance. Techniques such as gain equalization are used to achieve a flat gain profile.
Input Reflectance
Input reflectance is the portion of the incident signal that is reflected back into the amplifier. High input reflectance can lead to signal degradation and instability. Implementing anti-reflective coatings and proper fiber connectors helps minimize input reflectance.
Output Reflectance
Output reflectance refers to the amount of signal reflected back from the output of the amplifier. Excessive output reflectance can lead to signal feedback and instability. Output isolators and terminations are used to manage and reduce output reflectance.
Maximum Reflectance Tolerance at Input/Output
To maintain signal integrity, the maximum acceptable levels of reflectance at both input and output ports must be defined. Exceeding these tolerance levels can result in signal degradation and network disruptions.
Multi-channel Gain Slope
In multi-channel systems, variations in gain levels across different wavelengths can lead to unequal channel performance. Proper management of multi-channel gain slope ensures uniform amplification across all channels.
Polarization Dependent Loss
Polarization dependent loss (PDL) occurs when the amplifier’s performance varies with the polarization state of the incoming signal. Minimizing PDL is crucial to prevent signal quality discrepancies based on polarization.
Gain Tilt
Gain tilt refers to the non-uniform gain across the amplifier’s wavelength range. This can impact signal quality and transmission efficiency. Techniques such as using gain-flattening filters help achieve a more balanced gain distribution.
Gain Ripple
Gain ripple represents small fluctuations in gain across the amplifier’s operating range. Excessive gain ripple can cause signal distortions and affect network performance. Implementing gain equalization techniques minimizes gain ripple.
Conclusion
Understanding and optimizing these performance parameters is essential for ensuring the efficiency, reliability, and overall performance of optical amplifiers in complex communication networks. By carefully managing these parameters, network operators can achieve seamless transmission of data and maximize the potential of optical amplifier technology.
What is CD?
Chromatic dispersion (CD) is a property of optical fiber (or optical component) that causes different wavelengths of a light source to propagate at different velocities, means if transmitting signal, from a LASER source, this LASER source having spectral width and emit different wavelengths apart from its center wavelength. Since all light sources consist of a narrow spectrum of light (comprising of many wavelengths), all fiber transmissions are affected by chromatic dispersion to some degree. In addition, any signal modulating a light source results in its spectral broadening and hence exacerbating the chromatic dispersion effect. Since each wavelength of a signal pulse propagates in a fiber at a slightly different velocity, each wavelength arrives at the fiber end at a different time. This results in signal pulse spreading, which leads two inter-symbol Interference between pulses and increases bit errors
What is cause of CD?
Chromatic dispersion is due to an inherent property of silica optical fiber. The speed of a light wave depends on the refractive index, n, of the medium within which it is traversing. In silica optical fiber, as well as many other materials, n changes as a function of wavelength. Thus, different wavelengths travel at slightly different speeds along the optical fiber. A wavelength pulse is composed of several wavelength components or spectra. Each of its spectral constituents travel at slightly different speeds within the optical fiber. The result is a spreading of the transmission pulse as it travels through the optical fiber.
What is unit of CD and CD Coefficient?
The chromatic dispersion (CD) parameter is a measure of signal pulse spread in a fiber due to this effect. It is expressed with ps/nm units, where the picoseconds refer to the Signal pulse spread in time and the nanometers refer to the signal’s spectral width. Chromatic dispersion can also be expressed as fiber length multiplied by proportionality
Coefficient. This coefficient is referred to as the chromatic dispersion coefficient and is measured in units of picoseconds per nanometer times kilometer, ps/(nm ⋅ km). It is
Typically specified by the fiber the cable manufacturer and represents the chromatic dispersion characteristic for a 1 km length of fiber.
Which are main factors for CD?
Chromatic dispersion affects all optical transmissions to some degree. These effects become more pronounced as the transmission rate increases and fiber length increases.
Factors contributing to increasing chromatic dispersion signal distortion include the following:
1. Laser spectral width, modulation method, and frequency chirp. Lasers with wider spectral widths and chirp have shorter dispersion limits. It is important to refer to manufacturer specifications to determine the total amount of dispersion that can be tolerated by the lightwave equipment.
2. The wavelength of the optical signal. Chromatic dispersion varies with wavelength in a fiber. In a standard non-dispersion shifted fiber (NDSF G.652), chromatic dispersion is near or at zero at 1310 nm. It increases positively with increasing wavelength and increases negatively for wavelengths less than 1310 nm.
3. The optical bit rate of the transmission laser. The higher the fiber bit rate, the greater the signal distortion effect.
4. The chromatic dispersion characteristics of fiber used in the link. Different types of fiber have different dispersion characteristics.
5. The total fiber link length, since the effect is cumulative along the length of the fiber.
6. Any other devices in the link that can change the link’s total chromatic dispersion including chromatic dispersion compensation modules.
7. Temperature changes of the fiber or fiber cable can cause small changes to chromatic dispersion. Refer to the manufacturer’s fiber cable specifications for values.
How to mitigate CD in a link?
1. Change the equipment laser with a laser that has a specified longer dispersion limit. This is typically a laser with a narrower spectral width or a laser that has some form of pre-compensation. As laser spectral width decreases, chromatic dispersion limit increases.
2. For new construction, deploy NZ-DSF instead of SSMF fiber.NZ-DSF has a lower chromatic dispersion specification.
3. Insert chromatic dispersion compensation modules (DCM) into the fiber link to compensate for the excessive dispersion. The optical loss of the DCM must be added to the link optical loss budget and optical amplifiers may be required to compensate.
4. Deploy a 3R optical repeater (re-amplify, reshape, and retime the signal) once a link reaches chromatic dispersion equipment limit.
5. For long haul undersea fiber deployment, splicing in alternating lengths of dispersion compensating fiber can be considered.
6. To reduce chromatic dispersion variance due to temperature, buried cable is preferred over exposed aerial cable.
In the realm of optical communication, precision and reliability are paramount. Amidst the intricate components and techniques that ensure seamless data transmission, Differential Group Delay (DGD) emerges as a critical factor. This article takes you on a journey through the intricacies of DGD, unraveling its definition, implications, measurement techniques, and strategies for effective management. By the end, you’ll not only understand the concept of DGD but also appreciate its significance in maintaining the integrity of optical signals.
Differential Group Delay (DGD) refers to the time difference between two orthogonal polarization states of an optical signal as it traverses a medium, such as a fiber-optic cable. This phenomenon arises due to various factors, including birefringence within the optical components and environmental conditions. DGD has the potential to degrade signal quality, leading to signal distortion, reduced data rates, and increased bit error rates.
DGD’s impact on optical communication is profound, influencing the overall system performance in multiple ways:
DGD can cause pulse spreading and overlapping, leading to signal distortion and compromised data integrity.
In high-speed optical systems, DGD poses challenges to dispersion compensation techniques, affecting data transmission over long distances.
As DGD grows, the probability of bit errors occurring within the signal rises, directly impacting the reliability of the communication link.
Managing DGD is crucial for ensuring the robustness of optical systems against external factors, such as temperature variations and mechanical stress.
Measuring DGD accurately is essential for identifying potential signal degradation and implementing effective mitigation strategies. Several techniques are employed for DGD measurement:
Interferometric techniques exploit interference between two orthogonal polarization states to determine DGD with high precision.
Time-domain methods involve introducing a known time delay between polarization states and measuring the resultant phase difference.
Spectral analysis techniques utilize the spectral characteristics of the signal to calculate DGD based on phase variations.
Efficiently managing DGD is imperative for maintaining optimal signal quality and system performance:
Sophisticated PMD compensation techniques, such as adaptive compensation, can mitigate the effects of DGD.
Incorporating dispersion compensation modules helps counteract signal distortion caused by DGD.
Selecting appropriate modulation formats can enhance the system’s tolerance to DGD-induced signal degradation.
Implementing real-time monitoring and feedback mechanisms enables dynamic adjustments to mitigate DGD-related issues.
Polarization mode dispersion (PMD) is a property of a single-mode fiber or an optical component where pulse spreading is caused by different propagation velocities of the signal’s two orthogonal polarizations. Optical fibers or optical components can be modeled with two orthogonal polarization axes called principal states of polarization (PSP).
An optical signal propagating in a fiber is resolved into these two PSP axes. Each polarization axis (fast and slow axis) has a different propagation velocity. This is due to different refractive indexes in each axis caused by the birefringence of the material. The different velocities lead to pulse spreading at the receiver end.
PMD can be expressed as the square root of the fiber length multiplied by a proportionality coefficient. This coefficient is referred to as the PMD coefficient and is measured in units of picoseconds per square root kilometer (ps/√km). The PMD coefficient is typically specified by fiber cable manufacturers and represents the PMD characteristic for a particular length of that fiber.
Fiber characterization can be defined as the field measurement and recording of fiber span parameters that affect signal transmission over all or selected operating wavelengths. These measured parameters provide a true picture of the fiber span’s transmission limitations. They are used in network planning to ensure transmission links are designed within transceiver operating budgets and limits. Full fiber characterization is often necessary in modern high-speed link designs, where optical budgets are stretched to their maximum with little or no margin for error. Fiber quality can also be assessed with these parameters. Fiber characterization is performed after new fiber cable link construction, dark fiber purchase, or lease. This helps to ensure the fiber quality meets or exceeds required specifications and expectations. It also documents fiber parameters at the time of construction or acquisition for comparison with future measurements to determine fiber degradation due to aging, damage, and repair.
Macro bending: Macrobending is the attenuation associated with bending or wrapping the fiber. Light can “leak out” of a fiber when it is bent. As the bend becomes tighter, more light escapes. Macrobending loss, measured in decibels, increases at longer wavelengths where the optical confinement of the light is weaker. It also increases linearly with the number of turns. Traditionally, macrobending was not a limiting effect when cables were mostly of loose-tube or ribbon design and installed into ducts. The tightest bends incurred by fibers were in splice trays, where excess fiber would be stored in loops after jointing. This was reflected in the macrobending specification of ITU-T Recommendation G.652, where a minimum bend radius of 30 mm was defined to reflect typical splice tray dimensions and 100 turns were agreed upon to simulate the total excess fiber from all the splice sites between repeaters. But macrobending effects become more pronounced in networks installed close-to and within the building. Prevalent in this segment of the network are low-diameter mini-cables that are stripped-back designs, compared to the traditional sheathed loose-tube and ribbon cables. Lightweight and highly flexible, these new designs are preferred for their space efficiency (when installed into commensurately small micro-ducts) and ease of handling and routing (when installed on the inside and outside of buildings along tortuous paths). Bend radii of much less than 30 mm therefore have become commonplace.
Micro bending :Microbending attenuation of an optical fiber relates to the light signal loss associated with lateral stresses along the length of the fiber. The loss is due to the coupling from the fiber’s guided fundamental mode to lossy, higher-order radiation modes. Mode coupling occurs when fibers suffer small random bends along
the fiber axes. This random bending is usually caused by external mechanical stresses against the cable material that compress the fiber. The result is random, high-frequency perturbations to the fiber. Lateral stresses can be caused by pressure induced by manufacturing or installation or by temperature-induced dimensional changes in cabling materials that cause undesirable fiber/fiber or fiber/cable material interactions. These interactions can give rise to random microscopic bends or curvatures of <1-mm radius that create very small displacements of the fiber core from the fiber axis. Microbending effects can be seen at all the commonly used wavelengths in single mode fibers (1310, 1550, and 1625 nm), whereas macrobending effects are seen predominantly at 1550 and 1625 nm.
Latency is a time delay experienced in system and it describes how long it takes for data to get from transmission side to receiver side. In a fiber optical communication system, it is essentially the length of optical fiber divided by the speed of light in fiber core, supplemented with delay induced by optical and electro optical elements plus any extra processing time required by system, also called overhead. Signal processing delay can be reduced by using parallel processing based on large scale integration CMOS technologies.
Added to the latency due to propagation in the fiber, there are other path building blocks that affect the total data transport time. These elements include
|
Band Description |
Wavelength Range (nm) |
|
850 Multimode Window |
800-910 |
|
O Original |
1260-1360 |
|
E Extended |
1360-1460 |
|
S Short |
1460-1530 |
|
C Conventional (EDFA Window) |
1530-1565 |
|
L Long (Extended EDFA) |
1565-1625 |
|
U Ultra Long Haul |
1625-1675 |
|
Significance |
ITU-T Standards |
Characteristics |
Wavelength Coverage |
Applications |
|
50/125µm Graded-Index Multimode Fiber for FTTH Systems |
G.651.1 |
Cladding Diameter & Core Diameter: 125 ±2 µm; 50 ±3 µm Macrobend loss: 15mm Attenuation: “Max at 850 nm: 1 dB Max at 1300 nm: 1 dB Max at 850 nm: 3.5 dB/km Max at 1300 nm: 1.0 dB/km” |
850 nm; 1300 nm |
Support FTTH and FTTZ architectures; Recommend the use of quartz multimode fiber for access networks in specific environments. |
|
Standard Single-Mode Fiber for CWDM Systems |
G.652.A |
Max PMDQ=0.5 ps/√ km |
O and C bands |
Support applications such as those recommended in ITU-T G.957 and G.691 up to STM-16, as well as 10 Gbit/s up to 40 km(Ethernet) and STM-256 for ITU-T G.693. |
|
G.652.B |
Maximum attenuation specified at 1625 nm. Max PMDQ=0.2 ps/√ km |
O, C and L bands |
Support higher bit-rate applications up to STM-64, such as some in ITU-T G.691 and G.692, and STM-256 for applications in ITU-T G.693 and G.959.1. |
|
|
G.652.C |
Maximum attenuation specified at 1383 nm (equal or lower than 1310 nm). Max PMDQ=0.5 ps/√ km |
O, E, S, C and L bands |
Similar to G.652.A, but this standard allows transmission in portions of an extended wavelength range from 1360 nm to 1530 nm. Suitable for CWDM systems. |
|
|
G.652.D |
Maximum attenuation specified from 1310 to 1625 nm. Maximum attenuation specified at 1383 nm (equal or lower than 1310 nm). Max PMDQ=0.2 ps/√ km |
O, E, S, C and L bands |
Similar to G.652.B, but this standard allows transmission in portions of an extended wavelength range from 1360 nm to 1530 nm. Suitable for CWDM systems. |
|
|
Dispersion-Shifted Single-mode Optical Fiber for Long Haul Transmission |
G.653.A |
Zero chromatic dispersion value at 1550 nm. Maximum attenuation of 0.35 dB/km at 1550 nm. Max PMDQ=0.5 ps/√ km |
1550 nm |
Supports high bit rate applications at 1550 nm over long distances. |
|
G.653.B |
Maximum attenuation specified at 1550 nm only. Max PMDQ=0.2 ps/√ km |
1550 nm |
With a low PMD coefficient, this standard supports higher bit rate transmission applications than G.653.A. |
|
|
Cut-off Shifted Single-mode Fiber for Long Haul Submarine & Terrestrial Networks |
G.654.A |
Maximum attenuation of 0.22 dB/km at 1550 nm. Max PMDQ=0.5 ps/√ km |
1550 nm |
Suited for long-distance digital transmission applications, such as long-haul terrestrial line systems and submarine cable systems using an optical amplifier. |
|
G.654.B |
Maximum attenuation of 0.22 dB/km at 1550 nm. Max PMDQ=0.20 ps/√ km |
1550 nm |
Same ITU-T system as G.654.A and for ITU-T G.69.1 long-haul applications in the 1550 nm region. Also suited for longer distance and larger WDM repeaterless submarine systems with remotely pumped optical amplifiers in G.973. Also, for submarine systems with optical amplifiers in G.977 |
|
|
G.654.C |
Maximum attenuation of 0.22 dB/km at 1550 nm. Max PMDQ=0.20 ps/√ km |
1550 nm |
Suited for higher bit-rate and long-haul applications in G.959.1. |
|
|
G.654.D |
Maximum attenuation of 0.20 dB/km at 1550 nm. Max PMDQ=0.20 ps/√ km |
1550 nm |
Suited for higher bit-rate submarine systems in G.973, G.973.1, G.973.2, and G.977. |
|
|
G.654.E |
Maximum attenuation of 0.23dB/km at 1550nm. Max PMDQ=0.20 ps/√ km |
1550 nm |
Similar to ITU-T G.654.B, but has a smaller macrobending loss specification equivalent to ITU-T G.652.D fibers, and a tightened range of nominal MFD. For deployment as terrestrial cables with improved OSNR characteristics to support higher bit-rate coherent transmission, e.g., 100G/200G/400G systems. |
|
|
Legacy Long Haul Single-mode Fiber for CWDM System |
G.655.A |
Maximum attenuation at 1550 nm only. Lower CD value than B and C category. Max |
C band |
Support DWDM transmission (G.692) applications in the C band with down to 200GHz channel spacing. |
|
G.655.B |
Maximum attenuation specified at 1550 and 1625 nm. Max PMDQ=0.5 ps/√ km |
C+L band |
Support DWDM transmission (G.692) applications in the C+L band with down to 100GHz channel spacing. |
|
|
G.655.C |
Maximum attenuation specified at 1550 and 1625 nm. Max PMDQ=0.2 ps/√ km |
O to C band |
Similar to G.655.B, but allows for transmission applications at high bit rates for STM-64 (10 Gbps) up to 2000 km. Also suitable for STM-256 (40 Gbps). |
|
|
G.655.D |
Maximum attenuation specified at 1550 and 1625 nm. Max PMDQ=0.2 ps/√ km |
C+L band |
For wavelengths greater than 1530 nm. Similar applications to G.655.B are supported. For wavelength, less than 1530 nm, can support CWDM applications at channels 1471 nm and higher. |
|
|
G.655.E |
Maximum attenuation specified at 1550 and 1625 nm. Max PMDQ=0.2 ps/√ km |
C+L band |
Similar to G.655.D, but have higher CD values for applications with small channel spacing. |
|
|
Non-zero Dispersion Fiber for CWDM and DWDM System |
G.656 |
Maximum attenuation at 1460, 1550, and 1625 nm. Max PMDQ=0.2 ps/√ km |
S, C and L band |
Supports both CWDM and DWDM systems throughout the wavelength range of 1460 nm to 1625 nm. |
|
Bend-insensitive Single-mode Fiber for FTTH Systems |
G.657.A |
At 15 mm radius, 10 turns, 0.25 dB max at 1550 nm, 1 dB max at 1625 nm. Max PMDQ=0.20 ps/√ km |
from O to L band |
Optimized access installation with respect to macro bending, loss, other parameters being similar to G.652.D. |
|
G.657.B |
At 15 mm radius, 10 turns, 0.03 dB max at 1550 nm, 0.1 dB max at 1625 nm |
from O to L band |
Supports optimized access network installation with very small bending radii applied in fiber management systems and particularly for restricted distance installations. |
When the bit error occurs to the system, generally the OSNR at the transmit end is well and the fault is well hidden.
Decrease the optical power at the transmit end at that time. If the number of bit errors decreases at the transmit end, the problem is non-linear problem.
If the number of bit errors increases at the transmit end, the problem is the OSNR degrade problem.
One method to reduce FWM effects is to use transmission fiber that has high chromatic dispersion coefficient at the signal wavelength such as standard single-mode fiber SSMF (ITU-T G.652). The typical chromatic dispersion coefficient of SSMF is 18 ps/nm ⋅ km @ 1550 nm which helps to significantly reduce FWM from occurring. Even a lower chromatic dispersion coefficient significantly helps in reducing FWM such as NZ-DSF fiber (ITU-T G.655). This fiber is specially designed with low chromatic dispersion coefficient (~4 ps/nm ⋅ km @ 1550 nm) for extended transmission distance but high enough to significantly reduce FWM effects.
To reduce these effects is to lower signal power in the fiber or use fiber with a larger cross sectional area to reduce the signal power density.
A third method to help reduce FWM effects is to space signal channels unevenly.
A fourth method to reduce FWM effects is to use DWDM systems with wide channel spacing. The magnitude of FWM effect is dependent on channel spacing. Wider spaced
DWDM channels generate weaker FWM components.
Work of transmission systems is to transmit signal from one location to another location over media and receive signal error free. Lot of impairments caused by Transmission media, system components and by signal itself. As in DWDM network each channel which carries signals like SDH, SONET, and Ethernet propagates in optical domain it encounters with linear and nonlinear effects, which distort signal pulse shape and amplitude. As each signal generated and received by Transceivers or Transponders. When this distorted optical signal received by Transceiver, it converts the optical signal in electrical signal, which decodes the actual information like SDH, SONET or Ethernet carry over individual channel. In digital format the impact of optical Linear and nonlinear impairments are detected as BER. Because these impairments, changed the original patterns of pulse shape and amplitude of signal, pulse width expansion leads to inter symbol interference, and at receiver end this is decoded 1 as 0 or 0 as 1, which cause BER.
These nonlinear interactions can be divided into three main categories:
(1) Brillouin effect,
(2) Kerr effect, and
(3) Raman effect.
Stimulated Brillouin Scattering (Brillouin effect)
Stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) is an inelastic phenomenon resulting from the scattering of photon inside the optical fiber. The scattered photon is slightly frequency downshifted compared to the initial photon, the energy difference being transferred to an acoustic phonon.
When increasing the launch power, the optical fiber practically acts as a mirror whose reflectance coefficient increases. As a result, the corresponding fiber loss can significantly grow and the induced reflections can degrade the system performance.
When low power is injected into the fiber, only intrinsic Rayleigh back-reflections occur and the level of reflections is very low (around 32 dB). When high power is launched in the fiber, the backscattered power increases because of the stimulated Brillouin scattering
The SBS-related penalty can be minimized by keeping the per-channel power below the SBS threshold, which depends on the size of the optical fiber core and on the transmitter linewidth
Kerr Effect
In the case of a single-channel transmission, the refractive index of the waveguide is modulated by the fluctuations of the channel intensity via the Kerr effect. The amplitude of this phenomenon is increased by a high launch power and small effective area inside the optical fiber. This nonlinear effect can broaden the channel spectrum and therefore interplay with the chromatic dispersion, resulting in pulse distortion and broadening.
The Kerr effect is usually decomposed in three different contributions that are actually closely related. When a signal travels alone through the fiber, its modulated power induces a self-phase modulation (SPM). By contrast, the presence of several channels in a WDM transmission generates on each signal a cross-phase modulation. For the particular case of well-phase-matched WDM signals (i.e. moderate fiber chromatic dispersion), the Kerr effect produces four- wave mixing (FWM).
1. Self-Phase Modulation
Light travels more slowly when the optical power is high, leading to a phase difference compared to light traveling at a low optical power. The result of the propagation of an amplitude-modulated signal is known as SPM.Self-phase modulation becomes significant as soon as the launch power is typically larger than 12 dBm.
2. Cross-Phase Modulation
In the case of several high-power channels propagating simultaneously within the same fiber, the refractive index modulation experienced by one given channel is not only caused by the intensity modulation of this specific channel (SPM) but also by the intensity modulation brought by the copropagating channels. This cross-refractive index modulation is called cross-phase modulation (XPM) and can be described as a process through which the intensity fluctuations in a particular channel are converted to phase fluctuations in the other channels.
3. Four-Wave Mixing
When several carriers at different wavelengths are launched into the fiber and are closed to be phase-matched, new waves can be generated by four-wave mixing via third-order intermodulation process. The optical frequencies of these FWM-generated waves are given by nijk= ni
+ nj -nk where ni ; nj , and nk are the frequencies of the launched initial channels (i.e., the signal channels). Four-wave mixing can transfer a fraction of the channel powers to the frequency of the other channels through the generation of FWM waves. FWM is considered the most dominant source of crosstalk in WDM systems .It becomes a major source of nonlinear crosstalk when- ever the channel spacing and fiber dispersion are small enough to satisfy the phase- matching condition approximately. For an N-channel system, i, j , and k can vary from 1 to N, resulting in a large combination of new frequencies generated by FWM. In the case of equally spaced channels, the new frequencies coincide with the existing frequencies, leading to coherent in-band crosstalk. When channels are not equally spaced, most FWM components fall in between the channels and lead to incoherent out-of-band crosstalk. In both cases, system performance is degraded because power transferred to each chan- nel through FWM acts as a noise source, but the coherent crosstalk degrades system performance much more severely.
Stimulated Raman Scattering
Like SBS, stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) is an inelastic phenomenon resulting from the scattering of an incoming photon inside the optical fiber. The scattered photon is frequency downshifted compared to the initial photon, the energy difference being transferred to an optical phonon. When several beams propagate through the fiber at different wavelengths, the maximum energy transfer occurs for a 13.2-THz separation between the channels .
Channel interaction due to Raman scattering is not maximal for channel spacing lower than 13.2 THz, which is the case for WDM systems; nevertheless, it can still be significant for high-power, wideband systems.
Nonlinear effects are the impairments in optical signal caused by interaction of power levels of various signals in fiber. Non-linear interactions between the signal and the silica fiber transmission medium begin to appear as optical signal powers are increased to achieve longer span lengths at high bit rates. Consequently, non-linear fiber behavior has emerged as an important consideration both in high capacity systems and in long unregenerated routes.
A variety of parameters influence the severity of these non-linear effects, including line code (modulation format), transmission rate, fiber dispersion characteristics, the effective area and non-linear refractive index of the fiber, the number and spacing of channels in multiple channel systems, overall unregenerated system length, as well as signal intensity and source line-width.
Each data channel in a DWDM link is a train of pulses. Being finite in time, each optical pulse is composed of a range of wavelengths distributed around a central optical wavelength, which corresponds to the central wavelength of a specific DWDM channel. The total signal in the optical fiber is then the combination of all the DWDM optical channels multiplexed in the optical fiber. During propagation in the optical fiber, the shape and amplitude of each pulse is modified by various effects arising from the physical properties of the optical fiber material.
Linear Impairments: Impairments increases linearly as signal propagates in fiber with distance known as linear impairments like attenuation and dispersion.